Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wes Clark coming up on Deborah Norville NOW! n/t

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:00 PM
Original message
Wes Clark coming up on Deborah Norville NOW! n/t
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 09:00 PM by in_cog_ni_to
on edit....she's on MSNBC. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dan Abrams is
subbing for Norville.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's ON!!!!
:bounce: I'm going to watch, listen and drool! :loveya: :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. give us a synopsis
:) you can leave out the drooling part. LOL :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was just about to say...oh good, Abrahms.
"One of the two biggest issues is why Clarke wasn't harder on Clinton..." WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Abrahms wants to talk about Clinton
Wes wants to talk about Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wes seems tired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomSeaverr Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. This election is about
Bush not Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. I did not see that myself...
He seemed on point and constantly one move ahead of the interviewer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Clinton, Clinton, Clinton
Clearly, it's all his fault. :puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Abraham's was ridiculous
and didn't talk about Clarke...just wanted to ask why Clinton isn't just as much to blame. Clark gave him a good argument. Can't wait to see him on Newsnight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:11 PM
Original message
Still..
I was proud of Wes refusing to give an inch on that, and repeating that it's Bush that is running for re-election on this issue so what the fuck does Clinton have to do with it?

I don't think he looked tired, he looked good to me! :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well... he ALWAYS looks good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Well...
Not just that, I think he looked good tonight. I've seen him looking really tired, with the bags under the eyes, and he looked rested and handsome tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
18. He looked good to me too.
Can I drool now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunk76 Donating Member (867 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Please...
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 09:11 PM by bunk76
ladies and gentleman....welcome the newest "on my knees for bush" brigade member,Dan Abrams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Oh God, not this whore again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, so much for our media
being liberal.

What a joke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
13. Abrams the whore.
Edited on Mon Mar-22-04 09:14 PM by stopbush
A: But I think it's important to make a comparison, and the only person we can compare bush (on terror) to is Clinton.

Wes: With all due respect, I don't think that's the important question.

HA!!!!

Isn't there some Lacy/Michael/Blake story out there that Danny should be covering?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Abrams is like a dog with a bone
He always does this. He gets a hardon about a single question, and asks it over and over wasting an entire segment with a guest that is clearly not going to give him the answer he wants.

I actually miss Debbie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Actually I thought Dan did a good job
He was aggressive with both Clark and Flemstock. I have no problem with reporters who go after both sides equally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. But don't you think..
If it's clear the guest isn't going to take the question you've asked 20 different ways already, you should move on to something else?

It's such a waste of time, for everybody. "Hard hitting" doesn't mean repetitive. Move on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I think talking heads of any stripe who press Wes on questions
usually end up wondering how their disconnected head wound up in their hands.

In this case, the repetition gave Wes the chance to repeatedly drive home the terminal destination of the buck: Shrub.

And I love when they repeatedly throw him in the "leadership" patch; I just get goose bumps when he slices and dices the clown in the WH, in a civilized manner, of course.

So, perhaps unintentionally (?), Abrams helped make the major point of this deadly fiasco: the buck stops with aWol, and he is grossly unable to handle it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Abrams Was Civil Throughout The Interview. No Screaming or Cutting Off
ACtually, it's a journalist's JOB to bring up the points the "opposition" uses.

Gave Wes repeated opportunity to refute them. Wes did well.

:)

He looks great, but should gain 10 pounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Abrams isn't a screamer :)
I'll give him that, outright.

Sure, Wes did well, I just thought it was an entire segment about one question and it involved, once again, CLINTON!! When the book was about BUSH.

Could we please have a discussion about the current POTUS, without bringing up the devil Clinton? Or at least, something more than JUST Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I get your point...
Repetition works.

But.

Abrams was also able to repeat Clintons name about 30 times in the span of 5 minutes. So what you came away with could be either: Bush is at fault or Clinton, Clinton, Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Exactly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. In the army...
When you say, "With all due respect..." like that, it usually means you don't think much is due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Host Kept Trying To Compare Bush & Clinton
Clark kept on saying it's BUSH up for election, running on his record fighting terrorism.

Wes used football analogy... Clinton handed Bush ball and they left it on the field.

He made it clear that there were real, practical things that could have been done to confront terrorism and thoat those things weren't done.

He even mentioned Ashcroft... Bush SHOULD have directed him to focus on Al Qaeda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Abrams rising to a standing position!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. What a waste
of valuable prime time air time.

Dan Abrams is a lawyer, & FP is not his specialty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. Once again, Wes failed to mention his own experiences
immediately post-9/11. I don't understand why he's holding back...anyone have any theories?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. I think...
He's a spokesman for Kerry now. He is going to stick to the issues that Kerry want's to focus on.

The things he said about 9/11 could be trouble for Kerry, even though I personally love that he said them. Kerry just doesn't have the cajones to go there, like Wes did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. I'm sure you're right. That occurred to me as well. Thanks for the
input.

However, I disagree that Kerry lacks the cojones to take on this issue. He's reading Dick Clarke's book right now, apparently, and my guess is he'll come out with guns blazing when he's ready. Wes's experiences with the NeoCons may well be part of his arsenal.

I really look forward too to Rand Beers and Dick Clarke appearing together, hammering on the fact that they're both Republicans who resigned from BushCo in protest of the Iraq insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-04 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Well, I hope so..
I don't want Kerry to be Mr. Negative right now, the media is hammering Bush lately, the news just can't be spun that well, so Kerry can afford to be positive and above the fray.

That said, I think Kerry is going to run a safer campaign than Clark would have. Sometimes, he even made me nervous with the stuff he would say, because they were already trying to make him out to be some sort of a madman for even suggesting that Bush intended to go into Iraq regardless of 9/11. Now, we have several "crazy" people saying the same thing, hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC