Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if there were WMDs? Hillary knew there was potential danger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MojoMojoMojo Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:52 PM
Original message
What if there were WMDs? Hillary knew there was potential danger
She did the responsible thing.Urge inspections and denounce invasion.
With Bush giving her his personal assurance that he would pursue inspections,the threat of use of force should have only been used as leverage.
But Bush lied and people died.
Imagine if Obama had been a Senator and stopped any Iraq resolution ,and
then Iraq used a nuke a year later.
Would Obama have taken an irresponsible action?

Inspections were the best action and thats what Hillary called for.
She deserves credit for acting responsibly .
But its likely Obama would have voted yes or not been present for IWR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. anyone who couldn't see bush inc. was lying their asses off
was a fucking FOOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. God I think I might win a million dollars on Wednesday
your post is worthless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Goddamn, a lot of "what ifs".
We knew Saddam was NOT a threat. We knew there were no WMD's. Poor judgment is what every person who supported this illegal war exercised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. What if the UFO's come and snatch you out of your bed tonight and
whisk you away to planet Zarkon?

What if Santa really does have to get down and up your chimney to leave you presents?

No more fantasyland.

She blew it. We knew it at the time.
End of discussion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. That's not even a fair comparison!
Some idiots (read: congress) thought that Saddam had WMDs because he used to have them. It isn't fair to compare that to thinking that UFOs will "snatch you out of your bed tonight and whisk you away to planet Zarkon" for the simple reason that everyone knows that there isn't, and never was a planet Zarkon!

It's planet Doom, which is ruled by King Zarkon! Jeez.

Now if you said "What if the UFO's come and snatch you out of your bed tonight and whisk you away to planet Orilla?" then that would have been a more apt comparison, since everyone knows that Orilla used to be the Asgard homeworld, but isn't anymore since the planet was destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Can I still get probed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. That's between you and your alien abductor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #27
38. Now, THIS is the DU I know and love.
:hug::loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
37. Oh. Sorry.
My bad. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. What if Hillary had taken the time to read the NIE?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. We had inspections. The inspectors told us that the wmd's were gone
Are you telling me Hillary didn't know what Scott Ritter was saying back then? If not, why not? I knew what he was saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. The UN had ordered the weapons inspectors out of Iraq in 1998.
There were several sites of interest that the inspectors were not given access to. They were not allowed back in Iraq until November, 2002. The IWR was intended, in part, to provide leverage to force Saddam to allow for inspections, so you could argue the resolution to be successful in that respect.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2167933.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #24
33. Except for reality....
And that Iraq had agreed to let the UN inspectors back in 3 weeks BEFORE the IWR Vote

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/09/16/iraq.un.letter/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. And then retracted that agreement.
August 2002 Iraq invites chief weapons inspector to Baghdad for talks on resuming inspections

Sept 12, 2002 US President George W. Bush addresses a special session of the UN, calls for multilateral action against Iraq. Iraq responds by announcing it will allow inspections unconditionally, but quickly retracts the offer, making it conditional on no new US resolutions.

Sept 22 ,2002 British PM Tony Blair releases dossier showing Iraq has significant WMD capabilities, in an effort to gain support for British role in projected US invasion.

Nov 8, 2002 UN Security Council Resolution 1441 calls on Iraq to cooperate with UN inspection teams and not to obstruct UN forces. Iraq must declare all weapons of mass destruction in its possession by December 8, 2002. UNMOVIC inspection teams began inspecting sites in Iraq.

http://www.mideastweb.org/iraqtimeline.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Nope
Your "link" makes no such statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Please read again.
Sept 12, 2002 . . . Iraq responds by announcing it will allow inspections unconditionally, but quickly retracts the offer, making it conditional on no new US resolutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Nope.
Check the dates, your link is completely incorrect.

I gave you the ACTUAL story link earlier. Please deal in real news.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
43. Clinton was about to bomb 100 targets
Richard Butler is on the record as saying that US Ambassador Peter Burleigh (on orders from Clinton) told him to get out because the US and UK were going to bomb Iraq.
So yes, Butler told them to get out, but not because of non-compliance, but because Operation Desert Fox was about to blow up the inspection sites.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoMojoMojo Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
48. Scott Ritter was saying send back inspectors.Exactly the same as Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omphaloskepsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. You are right...
I guess McCain gets a free pass for his vote too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. fooled by bush... haha right.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. she does not have the judgment to be president of the united states!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Mummenshantz has nothing on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoMojoMojo Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. She saw correct intelligence of Saddam Husseins WMDs for 8 years
Then suddenly Bush cooks the NIE with lies.
How does anyone responsibly ignore the intelligence?
She pushed for inspections.
She did the right thing IMO.
Bush lied and people died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. UN inspectors disagreed with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. THERE WERE ALREADY INSPECTORS IN IRAQ
Bush made them leave

Jesus F Christ on a God-Damned Pogo Stick am I really seeing these right-wing talking points being spewed on DU? Have I landed in FR? Or bizarro-world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. The inspectors were not allowed back into Iraq until over a month
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. Tell the whole story please...
Iraq agreed to let the inspectors back in 3 weeks BEFORE the IWR vote.

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/09/16/iraq.un.letter/


The IWR vote had NOTHING to do with inspections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. The WMD's were moved to Syria
Hillary was right!

God save the queen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. It is clearly the difference between right and wrong. She was wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoMojoMojo Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Imagine if Obama had been a Senator
Imagine if Obama had been a Senator and stopped any Iraq resolution ,and
then Iraq used a nuke a year later.
Would Obama have taken an irresponsible action?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Momma always said
if a frog had wings it wouldn't bump it ass a hoppin. Whole lot of if's in the OP...many of us knew Bush was lying without the benefit of the NIE (Which she had failed to even read, but instead opt for the "reader's digest" version)

They used Powell and his presentation to sell it to the people and the world, and they had to use DRAWINGS instead of real actual photos and data.

Whole lot of if's killed hundreds of thousands of people, and sunk this nation to the level of barbarians, where we torture human beings now.

I have plenty of IF's too, If Gore had been president, he wouldnt have ingored all the warnings, and hundreds of thousands of people would be alive today...But if a frog had wings....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. What if there are UFO's and aliens from other planets? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. Anybody who's "fooled" by W
... is a complete fucking idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. She did not denounce invasion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
22. You're RIGHT! WMD's could be ANYWHERE. Let's bomb the PLANET!
Can't be too safe or too sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
26. Wow. I've heard that EXACT SAME argument coming from Republicans as they lamely try to defend BUSH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
28. If Chelsea had enlisted I might have bought that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. There is real danger, just not in Iraq. that is the problem. bogged down because the IWR passed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:57 AM
Response to Original message
30. The inspector lie has been debunked.

Iraq agreed to the uncondintional return of the inspectors 3 weeks BEFORE the IWR vote.

The vote had NOTHING to do with inspectors who were going back into the country whether there was a vote or not.


It was a cowardly vote for war... nothing more... nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
32. This is the problem with a Hillary nomination...
it helps perpetuate and excuse the lies Bush told to mislead the public. Iraq did not have WMD's and there was enough evidence to know Bush was lying. The last three chief weapon's inspectors all said Bush was lying to the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George_Bonanza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
34. Are you a Bush supporter???
This is unreal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
35. LOLOLOL!!!!
:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
36. she was either stupid or complicit
this phony bullshit won't fly. she outsmarted herself thinking Amurka might just become the Fourth Reich. She's lying and double talking now.

anyone with two functioning brain cells knew the IWR meant war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
39. Anyone with a clue knew there were no WMD's before the invasion.
Just ask Scott Ritter, or Will Pitt, or any number of other people. Iraq was already a disaster zone, completely destroyed by sanctions, and the WMD's they had were supplied by the U.S. and past their use by date. You have no idea what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
45. Powell wasn't worried...
"Hussein has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors."

-Colin Powell, February 24, 2001.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
46. Uh, there already were inspections at that point. They worked. Everyone who was paying attention,
knew there were no WMDs there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
47. Reduce the RPM on the spin machine.
The coolant is failing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
49. Go back to freeperville
Everyone here knew he was lying his ass off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
50. What if the moon WERE made of green cheese?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
51. What if my dog dropped golden turds...
but at the same time, monkeys few out of my ass, and then these monkeys snatched up those golden turds and carried them off to oblivion. What then?! How would I feel about flying monkeys NOW? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
52. What if there really was a Santa Claus.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC