Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark supporters: something big happening in one week

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:03 AM
Original message
Clark supporters: something big happening in one week
The following is a re-posting of GLORIA'S thread that can be found here because I think this is so darned baffling:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=48235&mesg_id=48235

"There have been some rumors about something big coming down the pike...and now, it looks like something IS going to happen in the form of a 'big idea.'


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/01/politics/campaigns/01DEMS.html?hp

link to page 2 where excerpt is from:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/01/politics/campaigns/01DEMS.html?pagewanted=2&hp

Democrats' Plan for Early Nominee May Be Costly
By ADAM NAGOURNEY

Published: January 1, 2004


SNIP
Some campaign officials argued that it remained early in the race, and that there was plenty of time for a candidate to come up with the kind of campaign appeal to take to victory this November.

"I think a lot of this has to do with the calendar," said Eli Segal, the campaign chairman for General Clark, who played a similar role for Mr. Clinton 1992.

"It's very hard to develop substantive ideas to distinguish yourself in the crowd with the rush of early primaries and all these debates," Mr. Segal said. "It's made for commonality of views."

General Clark's communications director, Matthew Bennett, called back later to say that the general would soon break the ice. "Wait one week and we'll have a big idea coming out," Mr. Bennett said. "I can't give it out yet, but it's not quite cooked."

MORE"

any guesses as to WHAT this may be? Perhaps the hugest endorsement of the primary season (other than the Madonna endorsement of course ;)), perhaps a release of earth-shattering fundraising totals, or perhaps nothing but a cynical publicity stunt — heaven forbid.

Everybody can take a crack at what this major development might be! You have nothing to lose but your credibility!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. an endorcement
would be my most logical guess.
then fund raising.
after that an early announcement of a potential veep.
running as independant.
it could get pretty out there if i keep going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dd123 Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Isn't a big idea like Kennedy's mission to the moon?
I don't think "big idea" means endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Jan 4 - watch MTP. Untill that, little things:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. Hey-that photo with Gert - she's a babe, isn't she?
Leave it to Clark to have a babe for a wife. But one of an appropriate age. Great photo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Great Photos
Thanks for posting.

Very intriguing - big idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
66. That's a cute photo. What is going to happen on MTP?
Or rather, have you heard that something will happen on MTP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. I said it on the other thread
before it was locked.

"I can't give it out yet, but it's not quite cooked."

It's free cupcakes for everybody! If that's not a winning platform, I don't know what is.

 

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. perhaps it's a suckling pig
that Matt Bennett, what a ham he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. great graphic!
where'd ya get that?? GO WES!

Very curious about this news...don't think it will be an endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. That cheerleader is still hot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madison Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. I would not trust or believe a word coming from Adam Nagourney.
Democrats have to learn to either IGNORE everything Adam Nagourney writes about Democratic chances in 2004 or fight back against Nagourney and write to The New York Times to complain about his coverage of the Democratic candidates.

Nagourney constantly pictures everything in the most negative way for Democrats; he will seek out the one person at some event who has negative things to say about the Democrats' chances and slide over anything positive.

He persistently quotes anonymous Democrats or "Democratic strategists" or Democratic Leaders" without naming them or identifying them in some specific way.

Adam Nagourney is the worst possible nightmare for Democrats and yet The New York Times has sent him to cover the Democratic candidates. Nagourney uses every opportunity he can to spin things to make Democrats depressed, or to get them to lose confidence in their candidates.

I would not trust or believe a word coming from Adam Nagourney.

I realize this post is a bit off the topic, but after following the provided link and reading Nagourney's article, I just had to speak out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Agreed, Nagourney's a bit of a hack
Edited on Thu Jan-01-04 07:59 AM by moz4prez
and very often his coverage isn't worth the paper it's printed on.

but the CONTENT of the article shouldn't go ignored. He does quote prominent figures in the campaign as having something BIG and IMPORTANT and ATTENTION-GRABBING in the works and I thought it would be entertaining, and ultimately disappointing (depending on your perspective of things), to speculate on what exactly the campaign was "cooking up"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
26. Ultimately disappointing?
Dean people try to play this game on the Clark blog - they try to overhype something (or outright lie) so that people will actually be disappointed with good news when they hear it. (I guess Dean didn't hire Gray Davis's hack for nothing.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Disappointing, depending on your perspective.
Edited on Thu Jan-01-04 11:04 AM by moz4prez
While I expect a lot out of the Clark campaign, it's easy to emotionally invest too much. We don't just donate $$$ to these candidates, you know. We donate our time, energy, and hopes, and it's healthy to keep your distance. So I lower my expectations, and preclude a lot of possible headaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wow! The bitterness here is overwhelming!
I try to stir it towards celebratory mood, but some are sulking...I won't intrerrupt you anymore. Resume sulking!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Big idea
It would be something like: energy independence by 2020
and a plan to achieve it.

That's what I think since Clark has been involved in alternate energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. That WOULD be a great idea
and one that is sorely needed. I heard on NPR that the wind/solar energy people are concerned about the environmental bill that's stuck in Congress, because tax breaks to their industry stopped today, and the bill reinstates them-along with encouraging dirty industries to get dirtier. A case of one good thing in a terrible bill, but it is making these people try to get it passed. If Gen. Clark can come up with a viable plan to make us energy independent, I think that these people would stop trying to get this horrible bill passed and would work to make sure that Dems win the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Clark has already worked with breakthrough energy systems...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatiusr Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. I second the energy independence speculation
Something Clark's been very big on. That sounds like the most logical explanation to me.

And yeah, the fact that it's an "idea" pretty much cancels out an endorsement or release of fundrasing totals, as those are more announcements than they are "ideas".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. Bush Thinks Best Days Behind Us- I Think They're Ahead Of Us
One of Clark's latest lines... and it's terrific. Optimistic and a true assessment of Bush without being derogatory.

Clark says this about Bush wanting to revisit the moon.

Energy Independance Goal would be outstanding.

YES! I know that Kerry has this in his platform... but noone has yet:

#1 made it a central plank
#2 come up with an effective, catchy marketing plan

Energy Independance would not only be a great way to talk about jobs, investment, environment and health...

it is the perfect opportunity to highlight the Democrats Progressive Nature and also the GOP's Obsturctionism on Energy.

It could also bring in the Green Party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. what bitterness?
Edited on Thu Jan-01-04 08:19 AM by moz4prez
It's just safer not to get too excited over indeterminacies!

edit: also, you realize this is New Year's Day, when everybody just wants to DROP DEAD :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Drop dead? I 'll go singing in my community garden in a few hours
For me, this is the celebration time. year of the Monkey - year when 8 years presidencies get voted in (Raygun, Clinton), and also, when Arkansan Rhodes scholars trounce one termers named bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. looks like we just have to wait and see
I'm sure it'll be worth the wait, whatever it is. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. whatever this "big idea" is I hope it concerns FTL travel
Edited on Thu Jan-01-04 08:56 AM by moz4prez
I wonder what the hell was so frikkin' funny about Clark's interest in FTL travel. It's not necessarily TIME TRAVEL. This is what attracted my attention to Clark in the first place. We can't just keep flying to the stupid moon, anyway, unless it was Europa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Here's your answer:
wonder what the hell was so frikkin' funny about Clark's interest in FTL travel.

Nothing. The writer of the article equated FTL travel with time travel. Then Drudge picked up the time travel angle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. And he issued a retraction of the article, didn't he?
Ah well. Too late for apologies, I suppose, since virtually the entire late night talk show circuit seized upon this "crazy talk" and a lot of viewers connected the newest entrant into a crowded field of candidates with TIME TRAVEL. Not a bad first impression though, regardless. I was ecstatic to hear a presidential candidate address anything in the realm of scientific endeavor that doesn't involve colonizing a Goddamn rock. At last, some new ideas!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. He would be one to speak of innovative propulsion, though...
See my other posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
18. I like OKNancy's energy system guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. I like OK nancy's Cristmas thread banished on DU (not to outshine others)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
20. I am with this guy who says:
"We've already got the best new idea: President Wesley Clark."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
24. How did you put the little face in the middle of your post?
I see only how to do that as a logo for the poster. How do you insert it within the post?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. the sig pic?
Go to the page featuring the list of threads. Click on "Options." Click on "Edit Profile" in sidebar, and insert the image URL in the "Signature" field.

Hope that answered your question :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
25. I think it will be about energy issues -- at least I hope so...
That's what I hope all the candidates will key on
because energy is the source of all wealth and right
now it is the root source of a lot of our problems.

I hope Clark will make it his signature issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
27. I've been reading about this for weeks. I can't imagine
what it could be.

I don't need a big event, myself. I'm voting for Clark. HE'S my big event.

BUT, if it's supposed to be a big idea, I can't imagine what idea would be considered "big" by the public en masse. One person's big idea isn't necessarily the next person's idea of a big idea. I've decided to quit trying to guess what it is.

IMO, it's not a good idea to leak that something big is going to happen, because it's often the case that the real event is not as big as the buildup is in the minds of the public. In other words, the real event might be a let down, compared with expectations.

Like when I finally see a good movie that has been raved about by everyone: I find that my expectations were so high that the movie wasn't as good as I expected. But if I had just seen the movie without hearing anything about it, I would've been bowled over by it.

(Is it an endorsement? An endorsement isn't a big idea, if that's what the big event is supposed to be. Oops. There I go again, trying to guess what it is.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
31. What's the big idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. All I can say is: Tick, Tick, Tick Dr. Dean--enjoy while you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #33
65. Do you know what it is?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
34. Kerry is dropping out and throwing his support to Clark?
It's the only way I see anybody being able to overtake Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Let Dean talk some more, and THAT is a good way to overtake
Dean.

I don't see Kerry's support as being that helpful. You think it really is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. It's helpful
but I don't think that will happen. If Kerry wins Iowa, he is in good shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. That would be major
I couldn't imagine. That would be unreal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scott Lee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
35. Clark's gonna do a striptease on VH1?
Oooo I knew this campaign would get nasty! Arf!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. DoveTurnedHawk also believes that something is in the works.
Though I don't know if he knows what. I have heard a rumor but it is weak and unlikely. I have also forgotten the source because of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. If DTH says something is in the works
something is probably in the works.

Seriously, that guy is something else!

Freaks me out, man. Plays a great game of poker too, I'd wager.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #40
63. I just wish he'd tell us what it is.
Or what he thinks it might be. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #63
70. know how you feel
wish I knew the "big idea", the waiting is starting to get to me. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. How long has this idea been floating around--as something
with potential, that is?

Maybe it really is a Clinton endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #74
77. got me
:) Don't get a lot of inside info down here in Peru. Just have to wait for the good folks at DU to clue me in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. Housing and the environment
I think Clark has been thinking about an idea that would encompass housing, urban renewal, and the environment...all rolled into one. He has talked about this before, but although he could see the goal, he was working on the pieces.

Of course, this would also mean "jobs" and be a major initiative for the country.

Don't forget, Clark doesn't buy into the Goldilock's solutions; he wants to know why we're eating porridge.

Geesh! For those who think I support Clark because he is electable; you are missing the message.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
42. ralph nader had some great ideas, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
43. He's going public with another speedo shot?
I dunno, I doubt if anything he does will get him above Dean in the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. thank you
for maintaining the high level of debate we've come to expect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. You're Welcome!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. do you remember when you supported Wes Clark?
it was only a few weeks ago . . .

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Yes I do
I wouldn't vote for Clark as dog catcher now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Yeah we know.
Nobody but Dean. Shamefull
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. It's a defensive response
to the anti-Dean nonsense I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
51. I say Clinton Endorsement
he has nothing to lose by it, and Gore sorta forced his hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moz4prez Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. No way!!
Actually, that's my dad's theory too. I strongly doubt it though. Clinton said he wouldn't endorse any candidate during the primaries and I figure he has no reason to break that promise now. He can do the talk show circuit and put in a favorable word for Clark here and there, but anything more would be unsafe.

I figure it's a release of fundraising totals, some all-star addition to the campaign staff, or a major non-Clinton, non-Hollywood, non-Michael Stipe endorsement.

It's all up in the air at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowDawgDemocrat Donating Member (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Clark Announces He Is A Republican and Will Be Challenging Bush for the..
Republican nomination. OK, that wouldn't really be that big of a surprise. No, I'm not ready to turn over the Democratic Party to a guy who decided he was a Democrat when the wind started blowing in his face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. and yet...
has become the most liberal of the candidates who are likely to win. I'll take that kind of Dem any day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. For the thousandth time...
Clark voted for Clinton...TWICE....TWICE....TWICE....and voted for Gore in 2000. He also was under NO OBLIGATION to tell ANYONE how he voted in pre-Clinton elections. His honesty should say something for the man. All you anti-Clark people can see is how he voted 20 and 30 DAMN years ago. It's ridiculous and a feeble argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. yup, so much for that wind
wind blowing in his face - bahahaha! so dramatic

so when did this wind start blowing?

the first time he voted for Clinton?
or maybe it was the second time.
or maybe it was when he voted for Gore...
must have been some serious wind blowing in his face that time!

GAWD! EYES-ROLLING LIKE CRAZY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #53
75. It's a policy paper
Unless there is a picture of Paris Hilton on it, it won't be as exciting as you think it will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #75
78. do you know what it is? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #51
64. At first I took Clinton at his word that he wouldn't endorse until
the nomination.

But when Gore went ahead and endorsed Dean, maybe that did change Clinton's mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
56. Maybe Hilary will run with Clark as VP.
Or she could endorse. I feel sure it involves the Clintons. Look out, there's a bumpy road ahead.

After all Bill Clinton said there were two stars of the party, Hilary and Wesley Clark.

Should be interesting. Very interesting indeed. This has been implied so often, I think it good to bring it out now. I really do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Too soon for that
I still don't think Hillary will run, I think Clark is being positioned as the un-Dean and will continue to run hard.

As for Clinton endorsing, I do think he will endorse Clark, but maybe not yet. I expect he will wait until Clark wins a primary. Risky for him to endorse earlier than that.

Then again, I'm certain there is a great deal happening behind closed doors that none of us are aware of.

As for this particular thread, I thought the leak was for a "Big Idea", not an event or endorsement. I suspect it's a major policy announcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. Wow, he did say that. I had forgotten about that.
Maybe his words are about to bear fruit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Yep, He did say that.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. When I first thought about Clinton's endorsing anyone,
I remembered what he said about not endorsing anyone but the nominee. But I HAD FORGOTTEN ABOUT HIS "STARS" COMMENT!

So maybe that's what it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #62
73. Clinton could still keep his promise if he remained in the background
with no endorsement even though it was announced that Hillary was to be Clark's running mate.

He could go on making his "two stars" type staements and whenever a journalist asks him if he endorses Clark, he can alwyas come back with a laugh and say, "now you know I said I was not making an endorsement for anybody but the nominee."

Hillary as Veep would certainly be a huge announcement that would definitely change the dynamic of the race. Wouldn't change my mind, but I have to admit it would be huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. They may well be considering clandestine options such as
these to prop up Clark and maintain a sense of legitimacy at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
67. Donna Zen wins.
Her idea sounds closest to likely. Clark needs some extra oomph on the domestic front. Seems this would be a good area in which to grab the spotlight.

That said, I'm thinking Clark's strength is on the international front, so how about an endorsement by all the heads of state of all the member states of the UN. Dream big, I say ... actually, I guess he probably already has that endorsement. Tacit, but it's there.

There again, strictly speaking, that's not an "idea". I'll work on it. <G>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Maybe he's going to get
endorsement by all the heads of state of all the member states of the UN AND the endorsement of the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. I really believe Hilary figures into this, either main or VP.
Definitely an endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. She may ride in on her white horse
after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning bush Donating Member (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-01-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
69. Homestead Act, Part 2
Clark has discussed a new Homestead Act previously, perhaps his will be his "big idea."

I have to say that a union between Clark and Clinton would help him win the Primary, but cost Clark in the GE. Therefore, I don't expect him to make such an announcement any time soon.

Put a Clinton anywhere near the nomination this year and you get every conservative out to the poll in Nov. Clark is depending on some cross over vote. Adding Hillary to the ticket would be douple plus unwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC