If * wins in Nov.

[PragMantisT]

Will Hillary kick Jeb's ass in '08?

[dawgman]

1. if w wins in nov. there may not be an 08

[MoonRiver]

2. No, cause the vote will be permanently fixed for Repukes.

We're deep into third world banana republic mode if * steals another 4.

[leyton]

7. There was life after Reagan...

Please, people. Calm down.

[R3dD0g]

8. Reagan was legitimately elected, both times.

Granted it was against pitiful Dem opponents, but his legitimacy was never questioned - even by me and I will be dancing the day he dies.

[Yavin4]

9. Reagan Also Had A Strong Democratic Congress

That kept him in check. Back then, the Dems passed laws explicitly forbidding Reagan from invading Nicaragua. That's why Ollie and McFarland had to sell arms to Iran to fund the Contras.

[MoonRiver]

12. That was before the era of BBV.

[progressiverealist]

3. my guess is he'd push to repeal the ammendment that limits him

from running for a third (and fourth, fifth, sixth term.

I don't think hed be successful- Pugs won't have THAT big of a majority.

[Nailzberg]

6. Let him repeal it, we'll put up the BIG DOG again!

Bill Clinton v. Bush. Could you imagine the voter turnout?

[Nicholas D Wolfwood]

4. If Chimp wins in November

I hope there will be some serious civil disobedience going on. No ****ing way we can deal with him for 4 more years!

[Kazak]

5. IF (big if) * wins legit (ain't happenin')...

There's no way he finishes his second term. Impeachment by the second year of his second term, for sure.

[Yavin4]

10. If Bush* Wins Again...

Then our economy will completely collapse in 2006. After that, God only knows what comes next.

[Yavin4]

11. If Bush* Wins Again

Then our economy will completely collapse in 2006. After that, God only knows what comes next.

[TowelBoy]

13. No offense...

but I think some of you are being a tad rediculous. It's not like the country's going to blow up. I don't want Bush to win at all, but if he does... I'm pretty sure we'll live. I mean... the cons felt this way about Clinton's second term.

[sadiesworld]

14. Difference:

The "cons" had no rational reason to oppose a second Clinton term, we've got plenty.

[usscole]

15. Pataki or Giuliani

I think that the Republicans will not want to nominate a Senator or Representative because of the difficulties in defending a career of votes, but they will also want to continue to claim an advantage on the terrorism issue. Answer - Pataki or Giuliani.