|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:48 PM Original message |
Does The Total Number of Delegates A Candidate Needs Go Up If They Reseat Fl & Mi?..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. No. That is one of the reasons why it is so hard for a candidate to get to the 2025 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slick8790 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Actually, yes, the total does go up. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. Got a link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yes. Those seats were removed from the total. - W/Link here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Where are you getting your info? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I updated my post with a link to the DNC site total. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lefty-Taylor (310 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Neither do I, K-cat. But I believe you are right (as usual). The total number came down to 2025 when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. If Those Seats Were Removed - What Was The Original Delegate Total ...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Approx another 150 more needed, or 300 delegates missing from the total. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:54 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. I thank you are confused as to the question. The 2025 needed for the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. No, sorry but no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. What does this mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:00 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. He's just wrong. He may be looking at the delegation total, not the delegate total. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I think we're both looking at the same question, just answering differently. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
23. Thanks Kittycat, I get it now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vincardog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. The 2025 number was set before the FL and MI fiasco. They were assumed to be included. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. See my post #2 w/link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. 2025 was the number without the FL and MI delegations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. But the 2025 was determined when it was assumed FL & MI was in the pool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Why are you trying to confuse everyone? 2025 was determined w/o MI & FL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. Kitty Kat's link will answer your question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Thank you! I get it now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
k8conant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-06-08 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
21. 2209 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Oct 18th 2024, 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC