Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Al Gore entering the race late ala Hubert Humphrey...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:56 PM
Original message
Al Gore entering the race late ala Hubert Humphrey...
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 10:58 PM by NJSecularist
If I remember correctly, Humphrey entered the presidential race in 1968 in April.

This may be the only way to not alienate the entire party. Both candidates supporters would have their feelings hurt if the nomination was given to the other candidate.

(Disclaimer: We all know what happened to Robert F Kennedy, and we certainly don't want that to happen here.)

We can hope, right? :)

It may be a neccesity come August. Both candidates could render their opponents unelectable after months and months of attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. NO.
No. hell no. Hell fucking no. Let it go. It's just a dream. I'd love it too but why would he take a DEMOTION to be our president? He's probably laughing his ass off right about now at the circus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, it's probably just a pipe dream
But being a president is certainly not a demotion. :)

Who knows what will happen from now until August, but there is a possibility that neither candidate will be electable come late August after they've ripped each other to shreds for almost 2 years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
54. You are right!
Will either of them be left standing? Will either be electable? I doubt it. Gore is the answer to this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another negative post. I'm waiting for something else.
Why do you keep the Obama emblem? Camoflauge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. How is this negative?
I'm still an Obama supporter. But by August, both candidates might rip each other to shreds and make either candidate unelectable after months and months of attacks. We are reaching the point of no return here where regardless of whom is nominated, half the party will be offended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. lol
Thanks for drawing that to my attention. I hadn't paid attention to who the poster was. It's too funny, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. I know...:wtf:
Gore doesn't want it..we're behind Obama now.

If you don't support Obama anymore, NJ..why don't you just come out with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I still support Obama, but Gore is my second choice if this thing gets ugly
And thus he is my avatar now. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Ye of little faith! Obama's gonna win and
hilary's made sure it's already UGLY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
39. Gore isn't running and won't be running. You need to choose from the candidates who are running.
You'd think this would be elementary but I guess its not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #39
55. That's awfully snide
It's generally not a good idea to be so snarky when you don't know what you are talking about.

I'm just sayin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Er, I certainly wouldn't hope for Gore's entry.
First off, if I remember correctly, Humphrey lost. And the process that nominated Humphrey provided the party its darkest hour in the last 50 years. He certainly wasn't seen as a uniter. Another entry into the race would not unite the party, but divide it further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hueyshort Donating Member (293 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The funny thing is, that now I think HRC will be better
than any of the guys I'd originally wanted - Dean, Gore, Edwards.
She has proven her mettle in the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unelectable ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. That was only possible because LBJ quit the race at that time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Actually I do really like Barack but this works Obama passes his delegates to Gore then go vp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. No way on earth she could attack Gore and Obama gets 16 years as vp and pres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. GORE - WAS - A - LOUSY - CANDIDATE
I know this is heresy to many people here, but the bottom line was that Gore NEVER came up with a coherent message or rationale for his campaign, lost his home state, lost Clinton's home state, and allowed the election to come down to a narrow margin in Florida that allowed the Supreme Court and FL election officials to interfere. Despite his admirable effort on behalf of the environment, I haven't seen any sign that he'd do a better job running this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I know this is heresy to many people here
Not to me, but I blame Donna Brazile for that more than I blame Gore.

Imagine if Gore had Axlerod running his campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
40. No big deal.
It's not heresy. It's just irrelevant. It's 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. He would be an unstoppable candidate with Obama. Plus two hefty awards under his belt.
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 11:10 PM by barack the house
Gore alone couldnt do it there is the AA base but if Obama negotiated his delegates for VP slot the game would be on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. ...
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 11:08 PM by barack the house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Candidates can change. They can improve. Look at Nixon in 1960 and then 1968.
Nixon never should have lost the election in 1960 after 8 years of an Eisenhower administration. But he did. His message was muddled. He didn't connect with the voters.

But he came back in 1968, focused his message, and won the presidency.

Very similar scenarios between Nixon and Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CookCountyResident Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. You nailed it.
Gore coming back in August? A pipe dream. No time to raise funds, for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
56. Key word in your post:
WAS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. LOL
god, you people are delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RememberWellstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. That would be nice
I think the nation would respect him now even more than ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verges Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. I was just thinking
about that possibility. Not likely, but I like it. And in this years season, unlikely ain't impossible. Just another wacky twist to this already convoluted election season.

How does a brokered convention work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. I don't think he'd do it at this point. Not sure he should.
He'd be recieved by some as a savior, possibly me included, but how many would actually leave either current camp to join his? I think at best he'd make it a three-way race, but not sure he'd actually win. He may sow more chaos.

I really don't think an extended process rather than a coronation is necessarily bad, or something we need to avoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. "I really don't think an extended process rather than a coronation is necessarily bad, or something"
Agreed. But what if we don't have a nominee until the convention starts in Late August and this party is still fractured 50/50? I am worried we might be getting to a point of no return...and Gore or Edwards may be the only solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. "...or something we need to avoid." I don't know. I don't think Gore will be a factor.
I see how the party could come out of the convention split, but to avoid that we'll have to demand the process come to an end before anyone has achieved the winning number of delegates. How can we call a race over when it isn't over? That would guarantee a split party. Without Gore coming in, we have to let the process continue, we can't be in fear of our own system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
23. Feelings
We are supposed to base these things on who might get their feelings hurt? Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. MOST people vote based on their feelings
This is not a new concept.

Us policy wonks and Democrat loyalists obviously don't, but the majority of swing voters do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
44. They are entitled to do that but history will record it and judge it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. Nope.. I don't think he'd be "liked" at this point anyway..
The majority of this party has wrapped themselves around Obama or Clinton. I for one would not vote for Gore over Obama at this point.. and frankly him coming in and stealing it is no better then Clinton, really.

Well.. we had a great chance to nominate the first black or female voter.. but at the last second, we opted for the white guy who lost once already instead. :eyes:

I know many like him (espeically now that he's out of politics).. but many don't as well. Many of Obama's cross-overs would not be on a Gore bandwagon.. he's to green.. to left for them. I like Gore.. but I like Obama better.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. He did not lose.
It was stolen from him by the supreme court.

And we should nominate the best person for the job, WHOEVER that is..white, black, female, or male. We can't afford the luxury of catering to our vanities now. It's getting a little late for..oh, the earth we live on, maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. Ahh.. there is some logic: Have the guy who had the '00 election
stolen from HIM, steal it from the guy who should win the '08 primary.

I think Al probably knows better then anyone how it feels to have something swiped out from under you.. therefor, he'd probably be the last guy on earth who'd want to do that to Obama.

Thankfully Gore seems to be far more ethical in that regard then Hillary Clinton does. She'd steal this election from her grandmother if needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
57. What are you talking about?
In RL, I don't know anyone who supports either Obama or Clinton. Besides that, how many who support them only do so because they didn't have the option of voting for Gore?

Too green? that's silly. No such thing.

And what's this about "lost once already"? Surely you don't believe that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. LEARN TO CONFRONT YOUR RACIST AND SEXIST FEARS. NO WHITE GUY IS COMING TO SAVE YOU.
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 11:37 PM by kwenu
It's time for America to take another step toward equality and live up to its promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. We can't live up to our promise..
if we're all dead from global warming.

If I feel Obama and/or Hillary is the best person for the job, then I will vote for them.

I guess it's unfortunate that a southern white male is better qualified than both of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. There is no southern white male in the race for the U.S. presidency.
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 12:03 AM by kwenu
I have no idea how you have decided a southern white male is better qualified but it doesn't really matter does it? Come back to reality confront your fear and move on. You'll be fine. Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #29
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. Actually no. I've voted for lots of white guys with no reservations whatsoever.
But there are no white guys on the democratic ticket this time around and fantasizing about Gore is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbluto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. Extinguishing the "Hope" of another.
So are the words "Hope" and "Fantasy" interchangable?

"Inspired" and "deluded"?

How unlikely does something one wishes for have to be before it crosses the line from a "Hope" to a "Fantasy"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Hope cannot easily be extinguished.
So are the words "Hope" and "Fantasy" interchangable?

NO!!!!!

"Inspired" and "deluded"?

NO!!!!!!

How unlikely does something one wishes for have to be before it crosses the line from a "Hope" to a "Fantasy"?

IF YOU'RE WAITING FOR A CANDIDATE THAT ISN'T IN THE RACE YOU NEED TO TELL ME BUDDY!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #29
45. That's a pretty huge leap you're making, there.
There are plenty of reasons besides sex and race to dislike our current choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwenu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Not a leap at all. There may be other reasons to dislike the dem candidates but
THEY are the Dem candidates. There are no other choices. There are posts on this board that suggest Obama should "GIVE" his delegates to AL GORE and then run as VP and everything will then be roses.

ARE YOU KIDDING ME???!!!!!

It's OBAMA OR HILLARY!!!!! They've earned it fair and square. If you don't like it take your racist/sexist ass over to the other party where you belong and quit pretending that you're something that you're NOT!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
53. lmfao nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
33. Gore will not enter the race because of half the folks do not
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 12:00 AM by BenDavid
like the man that should have been president in 2001.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
38. Oh do get a life
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
43. Or maybe Jesus will come and none of this will be necessary.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
46. I won't vote for Al Gore. Period.
It would alienate me completely from the dem party. I won't tolerate some guy who didn't have the stomach to fight for the nomination waltzing in at the last moment. Think I'm alone in that sentiment? Think again. Not just no but no fucking way. Thankfully it's just a pipe dream on the part of the true cultists- the Al Gore is god contingent. He ain't. He's another politician and as flawed as any of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Wow what? I'll vote for either of the two candidates even though
I'm not happy with a lot of what Clinton's been doing/saying and have reservations about her from a foreign policy viewpoint. I am not looking for a savior, and whatever else one can say about the two remaining candidates, they have the guts to fight for what they believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andrea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
50. K & R for my president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
51. That was a different time. LBJ didn't step down until March.
How could Humphrey - the VP - enter the race before LBJ - the incumbent - stepped down?

Bad night for history buffs here on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
52. Yes, we can hope and maybe we should be visualizing (it can't hurt)
You are correct that Humphrey didn't enter the race until April, after LBJ took himself out. But times were different then, RFK didn't declare until March. In 1960 JFK declared in January.

Personally, I preferred a shorter campaign, this thing has dragged on too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
58. Nice post, Nixon
Great way to not alienate the party. Maybe if we try we can have a nice productive convention too, like we did in 1968.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct 18th 2024, 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC