Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

THE MATH - Thursday, March 13 - After Mississippi

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 06:43 AM
Original message
THE MATH - Thursday, March 13 - After Mississippi
THE MATH – Thursday, March 13 – After Mississippi

8:00 a.m. Eastern Time (US)

Changes and additions today:
- Updated figures and percentages after Mississippi
- Expanded superdelegates section
- Numbers of additional superdelegates needed to win the nomination

Delegates needed to win nomination – 2,024.5 (considering status quo)
Pledged Delegates in – 2,652.0 of 3,227.0 – 82.2%

TOTAL DELEGATES

Estimated Total Delegates as of March 13:
Hillary Clinton – 1,493.5 (531.0 short)
Barack Obama – 1,619.5 (405.0 short)
Remaining Delegates – 909.0
(Sources: AP, Wikipedia 3/13/08)
Wikipedia link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

PLEDGED DELEGATES

Estimated Pledged Delegates as of March 13:
Hillary Clinton – 1,244.5
Barack Obama – 1,407.5
Remaining Pledged Delegates – 575.0
(Source: Wikipedia 3/13/08)

Maximum possible pledged delegates for each candidate:
Hillary Clinton – 1,819.5 (205.0 short of nomination)
Barack Obama – 1,982.5 (42.0 short of nomination)
Neither candidate can win the nomination with pledged delegates alone.

“Primary Only” Pledged Delegates as of March 13: (for informational purposes only)
Hillary Clinton – 1,090.0
Barack Obama – 1,107.0
(Source: Countdown with Keith Olbermann, 3/10/08, plus MS)

“Caucus Only” Pledged Delegates as of March 13: (for informational purposes only)
Hillary Clinton – 154.5
Barack Obama – 300.5
(based on source for “primary only” pledged delegates above)

SUPERDELEGATES (EXPANDED INFORMATION)

Superdelegates (highest reported for each candidate):
Hillary Clinton – 249 (Source: AP 3/13/08)
Barack Obama – 212 (Source: AP 3/13/08)
Remaining Superdelegates – 334

Under Status Quo:

Number of Additional Superdelegates Needed if Remaining Pledged is 50/50:
Hillary Clinton – 1,522.0 Pledged, 249 Super, 254 more superdelegates needed
Barack Obama – 1,695.0 Pledged, 212 Super, 118 more superdelegates needed

There are only 334 superdelegates left, so these would be the percentages needed:
Hillary Clinton – 254 of 334 – 76.0% of remaining superdelegates needed
Barack Obama – 118 of 334 – 35.3% of remaining superdelegates needed

I’ll share more details for this section in the coming days, such as percentages of superdelegates needed under other scenarios concerning Florida and Michigan.

POPULAR VOTE (for informational purposes only)

Status Quo as of March 13 (includes IA,ME,NV,WA,MS):
Barack Obama – 13,644,666
Hillary Clinton – 12,903,848
(Source: Wikipedia 3/13/08 plus states listed above)

Primaries only (Status Quo) as of March 13 (includes WA,MS):
Barack Obama – 13,173,496
Hillary Clinton – 12,639,549

Caucuses only (Status Quo) as of March 13:
Barack Obama – 471,170
Hillary Clinton – 264,302
(IA,NV,AK,AS,CO,ID,KS,MN,NM,ND,NE,VI,WA*,ME,HI,TX*,WY,Guam)

With Florida only added, as of March 13 (includes IA,ME,NV,WA,MS):
Barack Obama – 14,220,880
Hillary Clinton – 13,774,834

With Michigan only added, as of March 13* (includes IA,ME,NV,WA,MS):
Barack Obama – 13,644,666
Hillary Clinton – 13,232,157
*Uncommitted – 238,168 (Michigan only, Obama wasn’t on the ballot)

With Florida AND Michigan added, as of March 12* (includes IA,ME,NV,WA,MS):
Barack Obama – 14,220,880
Hillary Clinton – 14,103,143
*Uncommitted – 238,168 (Michigan only, Obama wasn’t on the ballot)

FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN SCENARIOS


These are ALL the possible scenarios concerning Florida and Michigan, and what it would require for Senator Clinton to catch up to Senator Obama in pledged delegates. These scenarios are for pledged delegates only. Superdelegate counts are not included. The presumption here is that most remaining superdelegates will support the candidate who wins the most pledged delegates from the state and territory contests.

If new elections are held in Florida and Michigan, the primary season is still almost done. Pledged delegates in would be 2,652.0 of 3,540.0, or 74.9%.

Changes in the number of delegates are considered in the percentages below.
With Florida, add 185 delegates (Clinton 105, Obama 67)
With Michigan, add 128 delegates (Clinton 74, Obama 0)
With Florida and Michigan, add 313 delegates (Clinton 179, Obama 67)

The current status quo is: Neither Florida nor Michigan’s slate of delegates are seated. (See more below this section for information about what the “status quo” is)

Scenario 1 – Status Quo
CLINTON NEEDS 64.2%, OBAMA NEEDS 35.8%, in all remaining contests

Scenario 2 – New elections in Florida and Michigan
CLINTON NEEDS 59.2%, OBAMA NEEDS 40.8%, in all remaining contests

Scenario 3 – Michigan seated as is, Florida seated as is
CLINTON NEEDS 54.4%, OBAMA NEEDS 45.6%, in all remaining contests


Scenario 4 – Florida not seated, New election in Michigan
CLINTON NEEDS 61.6%, OBAMA NEEDS 38.4%, in all remaining contests

Scenario 5 – Michigan not seated, New election in Florida
CLINTON NEEDS 60.7%, OBAMA NEEDS 39.3%, in all remaining contests

Scenario 6 – Florida seated as is, Michigan not seated
CLINTON NEEDS 60.9%, OBAMA NEEDS 39.1%, in all remaining contests

Scenario 7 – Florida seated as is, New election in Michigan
CLINTON NEEDS 58.9%, OBAMA NEEDS 41.1%, in all remaining contests

Scenario 8 – Michigan seated as is, Florida not seated
CLINTON NEEDS 57.7%, OBAMA NEEDS 42.3%, in all remaining contests

Scenario 9 – Michigan seated as is, New election in Florida
CLINTON NEEDS 55.9%, OBAMA NEEDS 44.1%, in all remaining contests

THE NEW ELECTIONS SCENARIO

Looking at Scenario 2 above, if both Florida and Michigan hold new primaries, Senator Clinton will need to win an average of 59.2% in all the remaining contests, including Florida and Michigan. That’s considerably higher than the 54.4% she would need on average in every remaining contest if Florida and Michigan’s delegates were seated based on the January primary results. Senator Clinton has achieved 59% in only one state during this primary season.

On the other side of the coin, if new elections are held in Michigan and Florida, Senator Obama will need to win an average of 40.8% in all the remaining primaries, including Florida and Michigan. Even though that’s higher than the 35.8% he would need under status quo in all the remaining contests, it’s still highly probable to achieve.

Clinton’s wins over 59%: (1)
Arkansas – 70%

Obama’s wins over 59%: (18)
Idaho – 80%
Hawaii – 76%
Alaska – 75%
Kansas 74%
Nebraska – 68%
Washington – 68%
Colorado – 67%
Georgia – 66%
Minnesota – 66%
Illinois – 65%
Virginia – 64%
Louisiana – 62%
North Dakota – 62%
Mississippi – 61%
Wyoming – 61%
Maine – 60%
Maryland – 60%
Vermont – 59%

MEMO FROM DNC DATED MARCH 5 REGARDING FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN

This is quoted here to show the current “Status Quo” used in the figures above.

Democratic National Committee’s official stance on Florida and Michigan as of March 5, in a press release from Howard Dean:

"We're glad to hear that the Governors of Michigan and Florida are willing to lend their weight to help resolve this issue. As we've said all along, we strongly encourage the Michigan and Florida state parties to follow the rules, so today's public overtures are good news. The rules, which were agreed to by the full DNC including representatives from Florida and Michigan over 18 months ago, allow for two options. First, either state can choose to resubmit a plan and run a process to select delegates to the convention; second, they can wait until this summer and appeal to the Convention Credentials Committee, which determines and resolves any outstanding questions about the seating of delegates. We look forward to receiving their proposals should they decide to submit new delegate selection plans and will review those plans at that time. The Democratic Nominee will be determined in accordance with party rules, and out of respect for the presidential campaigns and the states that did not violate party rules, we are not going to change the rules in the middle of the game.

Source: http://www.democrats.org/a/2008/03/dean_statement_45.php

(emphasis mine)

PENNSYLVANIA


There are 158 pledged delegates in Pennsylvania. Winning with 70% here would require Senator Clinton to pick up 111 of those delegates to Senator Obama's 47.

If she does this, Senator Clinton would still need to win by an average margin of 73.7% in all the remaining contests, under status quo, to catch up to Senator Obama in pledged delegates.

If new elections are held in both Michigan and Florida, Senator Clinton would still need to win by an average margin of 63.6% in all the remaining contests including Florida and Michigan, to catch up to Senator Obama in pledged delegates.

Only if Michigan and Florida are BOTH seated as is, from the January elections, AND Senator Clinton takes Pennsylvania with 70.1%, would she catch up to Senator Obama in pledged delegates in Pennsylvania. That's a very tall order, everything considered.

BROKERED CONVENTION

Feel free to share your thoughts and concerns about a possible brokered convention this year. I’d love to hear thoughtful conversation from all sides.

Link here from wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brokered_convention

OFFICIAL DELEGATE SELECTION RULES FOR THE 2008 DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTION

The link below takes you to the pdf file from the Democratic Party with the official rules for this year’s primary season. I’m still looking for actual rules or guidelines for the convention balloting process. Any links will be greatly appreciated!

Link here from democrats.org:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/apache.3cdn.net/3e5b3bfa1c1718d07f_6rm6bhyc4.pdf



*********


Please keep this thread bumped for easier access in GDP.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Permission granted to use this info in other threads
I am granting permission for everyone to use any of this information, in whole or in part, in other threads here on DU, and anywhere on the internet.

- phrigndumass

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. K/R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for your effort in putting this together & allowing others to pass it on.
Does it exclude Spitzer's super delegate vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks ... not sure about Spitzer's SD vote
The superdelegate totals given are the highest reported from any source. In both cases this morning, the source with the highest reported was AP. If AP included Spitzer, then this includes it as well.

There would be only a fraction of 1% of a difference without Spitzer's SD vote.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Watch for changes in Ohio as provisionals & absentees get certified.
These votes are concentrated in the urban areas so I believe they will favor Obama:



Last Updated: 1:08 pm | Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Election count starts March 25
BY THE ENQUIRER
HAMILTON CO. -- The Hamilton County Board of Elections expects to begin counting more than 12,000 provisional ballots March 25 and will know by April 3 whether any races are close enough to be subjected to an automatic recount. Ohio law requires the official count, which involves counting provisional ballots and retallying the ballots from Election Day, to begin between March 25 and 29 and be complete by April 4.

The results must be certified to the state April 8.

If the margin in any race is within one half of 1 percent of the total votes cast in that race, the race is subject to an automatic recount.

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080312/NEWS01/803120426/1056/COL02

BTW OVER 20,000 IN EACH OF FRANKLIN (COLUMBUS) AND CUYAHOGA (CLEVELAND)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Interesting, thanks! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Go to my journal to compare today's info with prior reports
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. good stuff!!! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Thanks, love your sig line
Yoko Ono, LOL!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Off to work, please keep it bumped
Have a good day!

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. 2+2=4 kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks for this comprehensive compilation.
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 08:50 AM by yellerpup
Your work is truly appreciated. Kicking for recognition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. Great info
So IA,ME,NV,WA, finally reported their popular vote totals? Or is this an estimate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. IA,ME,NV,WA ...
Although the counts are "unofficial", what they have so far has been tallied and reported. What I've included in the OP figures is what has been tallied so far. These tallies are on the state pages under the Wikipedia source linked in the OP. Click on the state name for more detail about that state.

Thanks skipos!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yurovsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. Beware the cornered beast ...
I expect the ferocity of the racist attacks from Kamp Klinton to escalate in the coming weeks leading up to PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
15. Impressive work! K&R n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. This article from the BG outlines some of the delegate progress...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Good quote from Obama at your link
Thanks elixir!

From your link:
"My bottom line is, I do want to make sure that the Florida and Michigan delegations have an opportunity to participate in the convention," Obama said. "And we want to figure out an equitable way to do that."

from boston.com, the official website of The Boston Globe

Good info about delegate process as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
17. kick and rec...
I bet you wont' see many Clinton supports on this thread..

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samrock Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. Sooo based on the above numbers..

Obama has 4% more delegates than Hillary.. Thats nice.. I do not want EITHER out of this race.. I want events to play themselves out and let all the states get there chance to vote/re-vote than we can see where we stand, epically in relationship to McCain and national/world events.. I want the candidate with the strongest chance to win in November to still be around.. It looks like the super delegates will be deciding this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. "I want the candidate with the strongest chance to win in November"
Check out the extensive SUSA head to head polls. Look at the number of states that Obama outperforms Clinton against McCain. Look at the realclearpolitics averages of Obama vs. McCain and Clinton vs. McCain.

What is your conclusion?

As Hillary decends into more ugliness and lies in her futile attempt to try to get the superdelegates to give the nomination to her even though Obama has won more primaries, more caucuses, more blue states, more red states, more swing states, more pledged delegates and more votes... I ABSOLUTELY want her out of the race. It is pretty obvious if she can't be the nominee, then she doesn't want a Dem president. She is free to prefer McCain over Obama, and I am free to think she is the worst Dem candidate in a long, long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
50. bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. I looks like they will seat the FL and MI delegations
So, I guess any lead that Obama had, is going to evaporate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Do you have a source for that?
Please give us a link. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. Both sides have to agree to that. Why would Obama agree to seating MI when he wasn't on the ballot?
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 06:21 PM by Buzz Clik
I, too, would like to see some verification for this.

======================

EDIT:

Here's the latest I've seen:

Obama camp raises flags about Florida revote

posted by Tammy Lytle on Mar 12, 2008 11:32:05 AM

Sen. Barack Obama's campaign is raising red flags about the idea of a revote in Florida to solve the mess over the state's delegates to the presidential nominating convention.

David Plouffle, campaign manager to Obama, noted that the lead advocate for a mail-in revote is Sen. Bill Nelson of Florida, is a supporter of his opponent Sen. Hillary Clinton. Plouffle said any revote would need to get U.S. Justice Department approval.

Plouffle again floated the idea of seating the delegations from Florida and Michigan - which were stripped of their delegates because they held their primaries too early - through some sort of negotiated "arrangement." One idea that has been tossed around is to evenly split the delegates between the two Democratic presidential candidates. If Florida's Jan. 29 vote were counted, Clinton would get a net of about 38 more pledged delegates than Obama.

"The easiest...is an arrangement that allows those delegates to be seated,"
Plouffle said. "But not based on those elections. That would not be fair."

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_politics/2008/03/obama-campaises.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Thanks for that, Buzz Clik
I read a broadcast email today from the Obama campaign that says pretty much the same. They're willing to allow re-voting in Florida and Michigan.

But seating Florida and Michigan as is, from January results, is out of the question.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. More tasty superdelegate statistics
Adding scenarios to the expanded Superdelegate section in OP ...

Under Status Quo:

Number of Additional Superdelegates Needed if Remaining Pledged is 50/50:
Hillary Clinton – 1,532.0 Pledged, 249 Super, 244 more superdelegates needed
Barack Obama – 1,695.0 Pledged, 212 Super, 118 more superdelegates needed

There are only 334 superdelegates left, so these would be the percentages needed:
Hillary Clinton – 244 of 334 – 72.8% of remaining superdelegates needed
Barack Obama – 118 of 334 – 35.3% of remaining superdelegates needed

**********************

Or, with new elections in Florida and Michigan:

Number of Additional Superdelegates Needed if Remaining Pledged is 50/50:
Hillary Clinton – 1,688.5 Pledged, 262 Super, 258 more superdelegates needed
Barack Obama – 1,851.5 Pledged, 216 Super, 141 more superdelegates needed

There are only 351 superdelegates left, so these would be the percentages needed:
Hillary Clinton – 258 of 351 – 73.4% of remaining superdelegates needed
Barack Obama – 141 of 351 – 40.0% of remaining superdelegates needed

**********************

Or, with Florida and Michigan seated as is, from January results:

Number of Additional Superdelegates Needed if Remaining Pledged is 50/50:
Hillary Clinton – 1,711.0 Pledged, 262 Super, 235 more superdelegates needed
Barack Obama – 1,762.0 Pledged, 216 Super, 230 more superdelegates needed

There are only 351 superdelegates left, so these would be the percentages needed:
Hillary Clinton – 235 of 351 – 67.0% of remaining superdelegates needed
Barack Obama – 230 of 351 – 65.5% of remaining superdelegates needed

**********************

To summarize it a different way:

Hillary Clinton needs #/% of remaining superdelegates if remaining pledged is 50/50:
Status Quo – Clinton needs 244 of 334, or 72.8%
New elections FL/MI – Clinton needs 258 of 351, or 73.4%
FL/MI seated as is – Clinton needs 235 of 351, or 67.0%

Barack Obama needs #/% of remaining superdelegates if remaining pledged is 50/50:
Status Quo – Obama needs 118 of 334, or 35.3%
New elections FL/MI – Obama needs 141 of 351, or 40.0%
FL/MI seated as is – Obama needs 230 of 351, or 65.5%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
28. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. The new math is here!!! Thanks, phrigndumass
Something else to consider: the super D's could end this agony long before the convention:

Right now using the AP totals, Clinton is at 1497 and Obama at 1602.

Let's say she wins PA 58-42%, netting 92 delegates to Obama's 62.

Then Obama takes NC 54-46%, netting Clinton 53 delegates to Obama's 62.
The same day, Obama takes IN 51-49%, netting each candidate 36 delegates.

Their totals would now be 1678 for Clinton; 1762 for Obama. If the remaining 336 super D's chose to, they could put Obama over the top at this point.

Not saying they would, but I think that's the point of critical mass where the super d's can seal the deal. It's more likely that they'll keep trickling in a day or two at a time so it's less obvious, but I don't think they'll let this hang in the air all the way to the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Careful with those numbers, I might propose marriage again LOL
Those projected takes are very close to the polling numbers, too. Wouldn't be surprised if it falls in line exactly like that.

Thanks!!!

:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. ROFL. And they say math is boring
I've been having a lot of fun with all these math scenarios. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Math is addictive when it's enlightening!
It helps you see the "why" behind the campaign decisions.

And it's more fun when others are addicted, too!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adoraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
30. excellent job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yes We Can!!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
33. kicking
Thanks for your work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedoraLV Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
34. Thank you!
Solid work.

-FedoraLV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Plush vote LOL
Cute kitteh at your sig link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. Thank you for putting this together.
Really nice work!

Very helpful information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
39. Now those are FACTS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
40. Many thanks for this.
I spent a couple of hours yesterday chasing numbers around a spreadsheet. It's dizzying.

The various scenarios will drive you absolutely insane, but the bottom line remains pretty consist: As long as Obama doesn't unthinkably cave and give Hillary FL and MI as they voted earlier (particularly MI), then Hillary has a very tough go of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Ugh ... Spreadsheets!
With all the scenarios, it's been tricky! The hardest part has been setting them up, and then double-checking it all to make sure it's all accurate.

And then automating it to update the figures when new data comes, so you don't have to do all the work over again.

I think I got it licked, though! Now all I need is a place to store it where others can download it and play with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. I would love to have your file!
Edited on Thu Mar-13-08 08:15 PM by Buzz Clik
This place is pretty straight forward for free storage:

http://www.box.net/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. I'll definitely check on this, thanks!
Someone else mentioned googledocs, but I don't want to sign up for an email address. This one looks like a thumbs up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
44. Speak confidently, without apprehension; you have the truth on your side!
This is the big stick you can carry as you walk softly.

Good night!

:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. good night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
46. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
49. THE MATH - FRIDAY edition will be posted later Friday
All the scenarios for superdelegates will be extra tasty, I promise!

Working on each candidate's superdelegate needs for two master-scenarios at the moment:
1. If pledged delegates remaining are split 50/50
2. If pledged delegates remaining are split 55/45 in Senator Clinton's favor

There'll be 9 sub-scenario in each master-scenario, concerning Florida and Michigan.

- Phrig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC