|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
slinkerwink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:02 PM Original message |
Thank You, Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. Good judgement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yeah, even Penn knows he shouldn't go there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I think it's b/c they know story's so explosive that they don't have to add to it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. You're probably correct about that. So far, I think Obama is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
41. Why should they go there? Obama is putting this show on himself. Just stand back and watch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. I love how they are pushing a 'scandal' involving land dealings..hm..the Clintons have no experienc |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. Umm. You do know that they were cleared of any wrongdoing don't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:18 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. You do know there is nothing wrong with what Obama has done and he isn't under investigation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rageneau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
33. You are correct. The Clintons have absolutely NO connection to scandalous land deals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
4. I have to say, thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
5. Nice move... Clinton is not a stupid politician. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IrishBloodEngHeart (815 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
6. he knows the dirty work has been done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. Has Clinton released her tax returns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:07 PM Original message |
April 15th. That's the next page on your calendar...This is March 15th. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
13. 2006 tax returns were filed last year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. She said they'd be released April 15th. That's next month |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. What's special about April 15? The 2006 tax returns are available right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Ask her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Very useful post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
21. why are they waiting until then to release the returns from 2000-2006? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #21 |
34. If they were worried about what was in them, they'd do it after PA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Chances are they will find a reason to delay releasing them another week after 4/15, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
49. they only been able to wait this long by using Tax Time as their excuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
28. SPAM every single thread gets 2-3 hits this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. They said on one of the news shows last night that the Clinton campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
10. I'm Quite Thankful For That. I Would've Been Extremely Disappointed If They Tried To Go For The |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. that's the only sign of class they've shown, I have to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Funny how such a tiny shred of decency generates such a big sigh of relief from Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Dude, if Hillary rescued you from a burning building |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I'm an Obama supporter (w/ all respest to jgraz) but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveOurDemocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:18 PM Response to Reply #20 |
25. DUUUUUUUUUZY!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:22 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Thats pretty funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. You had me up to "bitch" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. ok, I apologize for "bitch" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
43. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
38. Not really funny or fair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:07 PM Response to Original message |
11. Sorry to sound a discordant note, but does anyone believe they won't try to use this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
32. Yeah really... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
15. Thank you for pointing this out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
27. Teach you all---that post was nothing but lies and speculation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #27 |
42. " Obama Admits Repeated Poor Judgment With Rezko" Chicago Tribune |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
31. Class or political intelligence? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LTR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
36. She's letting the behind-the-scenes people get their hands dirty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caledesi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 02:14 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. I agree! NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
39. One trouble the Clinton campaign has is they have very few issues against Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
40. Smart move. This is not Hillary's mess to clean up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. yes, it was. i see Penn got asked twice about Wright. Hope he continues to shut up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
46. Chicago Tribune indicates that it's satisfied with Obama's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IdClaire (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
47. they don't need to say anything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-15-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
48. I think they're just trying to keep themselves in the picture. If the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Oct 18th 2024, 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC