Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Surrogate Botches Appearance On Meet The Press

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:47 PM
Original message
Clinton Surrogate Botches Appearance On Meet The Press
Jason Linkins:

One of the big problems with the fact that the Democratic primary process continues to grind on and on and on and on with nothing new on the horizon until Pennsylvania -- unless some other governors would do us all a solid and get caught screwing some whores again -- is that the media is running out of campaign surrogates with whom to talk. The A-Listers have long passed, and the B-Listers all said crazy things about how lucky black people are and how God hates America for Hiroshima. That's why we were saddled with the jowly drone of Bill Bradley today, his voice as dynamic as a bowl of week-old wheat crackers, boring us to tears today on Meet The Press. And yet, this is a net win for the Obama campaign because of the the gaffe-filled performance of Nita Lowey for the Clinton campaign.

Highlights? Yeah, we've got them. First up, here's Lowey making the case for Clinton based upon their oft-hyped "some states are more important than other states" strategy. Except she confuses "Ohio" -- which Clinton won -- with Iowa, a state that Obama won back in January and then apparently re-won this week when some Edwards delegates shifted to his side.

snip

LOWEY: Now, you and I both know that no one since 1960 has won the presidency without winning Iowa. We know you have to win Iowa, we have to win Pennsylvania, have to win Florida, they are key states that are critical to getting the number of votes in the electoral college, and I think right now, frankly, it's a tie.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/16/nita-lowey-worst-clinton_n_91756.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL.. I heard that Iowa gaffe and cracked up. She looked VERY uncomfortable with the TPs she was
evidently given to repeat ad nauseum. No one corrected her on it, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Nita musta gotten cornfused
forgetting that hilary got 3rd place in Iowa with Obama winning the first caucus state and then she got 2nd place after Obama cemented the win in Iowa where the hilary talking points were.. "Iowa doesn't count".

Nita had too many lies to keep straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Piss-poor performance.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 01:37 PM by InAbLuEsTaTe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. She also committed to releasing tax returns on the 15th of April
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. really?
what year on april 15th did she say
because it is hard to believe but
hillary will let april 15 pass and say she didnt mean this year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Exactly...we'll be waiting with
bated breath for hilary's tax returns and bil's library donor list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. her surrogate committed to the 15th date which was stupid
b/c the Clintons said, "around April 15th or after April 15th."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Guess it'll take that long to forge new ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. 2007 or the ones everyone has been waiting for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's okay
Obama, himself, said he won Michigan earlier.

People make mistakes and garble words.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No, say it isn't so, Obama gaffed? LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Proof and link of the statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Here it is:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Saturday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Oh you doubting Obama fans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. That was definately a slip of the tongue

I'm sure he was thinking he WILL win Michigan (on June 3rd). : )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. obviously
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 02:01 PM by maddiejoan
it was a goof.

People make goofs.

I don't even know why you made this a thread.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. Are you sure she didn't really mean Iowa?

She repeated enough that I think she really thought Hillary won Iowa.
It's not a big deal and it wasn't meant to be a flame thread. : )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mother Of Four Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Gerald Ford won Iowa in 1976. Michael Dukakis won Iowa in 1988
Someone didn't do their reading assignment before coming to class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. She also claimed the race was tied
and the tie-breaker should be the important states. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. That's what burns me ..."Important states"?!!
Whadda strategy and a early view of how ol hilary would run her decider presidency if we would only let her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Doncha know, only the states with TWO senators count.
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. Even if she had the state right, the argument is stupid.
To argue that because Hillary won the Ohio primary that Obama can't win Ohio in the GE is ridiculous. Nor is the fact that hillary won the Ohio primary an indication that she can win Ohio in the GE. It's typical of the nonsensical arguments and spin that hillary's campaign is using as a last resort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Precisely right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morningglory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. I enjoyed Bradley's answer to the first question: "How do we know who the
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 01:17 PM by morningglory
winner is? Delegate count, vote count, states won? Lowey: "talking point, talking point, talking point, talking point, yadayadayada ..." Bradley: "Yes." Just yes, the most votes. I hadda laugh.
Edited to add that I enjoyed Bradley's controlled, flat tone. It is similar to Obama's un-hysterical, I am just telling the plain truth, here. No Tweety hysterics, Hillary eyes-big-as-saucers, strained smiles. Just the truth, ma'am. P.S. do you notice Tweety is giddy, and can't wipe the smile off his face. He loves being the pundit in the center of the universe in his eyes, with the contest going on and on.
Edited again to add that I thought I heard her use "Democrat" twice where she could have used "Democratic". Odd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. thank you for agreeing with Obama campaign! He won Iowa, therefore he's President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. I have to admit she was worthless
She came off as not having anything to say, but saying it anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
27. Not only did she get the state wrong, she got the "fact" wrong too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
28. Glad to hear that the Clintons will release their taxes ON APRIL 15th.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 02:17 PM by Kristi1696
They're beholden to this now, unless, of course they'd like to publicly backtrack on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
30. she was really embarassing, and i live in nyc!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. It's kinda de rigueur for a
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 04:47 PM by zidzi
hilary surrogate to embarrass themselves spouting the hilaryworld talking points. I can't wait until this is history and we can read about the very first mistake hilary made was voting for the IWR without reading the 90 page NIE because the blood lost is the bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
32. What a fucking asshat - another example of incompetence from the Hillaryous campaign.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 04:58 PM by Major Hogwash
Fucking stupid, bumbling fools, fucking up on a daily basis on national tv.

Sort of like the Bush administration.

LoL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC