Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

George Bush is only president because he is white.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:28 PM
Original message
George Bush is only president because he is white.
John McCain is only where he is in this race because he is white.

Hillary Clinton is only where she is today because she is white and a woman.

John Edwards was only where he was 4 years ago because he is white.

Ronald Reagan was only president because he was white.

Why has no one ever said these things? If you find truth in what Ferraro said, then you must also find truth in the above statements.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. It also backs up my theory that if Obama were a white man, he'd have the
nomination sealed by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I truly believe that if John Edwards
had the number of votes, delegates, states won, movement, and momentum that Obama has right now, John Edwards would be the nominee. There is just no way I can really get my head around it. And he would be getting about 90% of the black vote, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. self kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. What you post was considered "the norm".
In this "normalized" society, it is what is, always had been, and ever shall be. It is expected and taken for granted and the end result was a "known". But when something upsets that "norm", it stands out and is ultimately pointed out and focused on because it is outside of "the norm". I.e., it is an outlier, ripe for endless speculation due to the fear of the "unknown".

So rather than take a chance on that "unknown", there is usually a push-back to keep the status-quo, which is felt to be the "safest course" because the result is usually "known".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Middle finga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. But after 8 years of Bush even the unknown got to be an
improvement. Even if a secret Al Qaeda agent had some how been president for the last 7 years they couldn't have screwed up america as bad as the bush has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Problem with the logic is that Ferraro's comment is wrong.
She said that Obama was doing well because he is an African American. It's funny because she's implying that liberals have an afirmative action program. Yet we didn't nominate Jesse Jackson. Democrats are voting for Obama because they believe in his message of hope and unity.

What she has done is discount his value as a person and a senator. This should never happen in the Democratic party--otherwise, we'd be Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redstate_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC