Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Both arguments - "Big States" and "Popular Vote" - disenfranchise voters EN MASS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 01:16 PM
Original message
Both arguments - "Big States" and "Popular Vote" - disenfranchise voters EN MASS



Much was made in the Clinton camp of Hillary's fervor not to disenfranchise voters in Florida and Michigan. So, can any HRC supporters explain why you are arguing to summarily disenfranchise a much larger swath of voters?

Your only remaining arguments for why the super delegates should reverse the result of our primaries, and hand the nomination to Hillary, are:

1.) she won a handful of "big states".

2.) she might win the so-called "popular vote". (emphasize might)


The "big states" argument throws out all the votes cast in the 45 states which you dismiss as "not big".

The "popular vote" argument throws out the expressed will of the people in 16 states in which caucuses were held.

Both arguments are embarrassingly undemocratic, and immoral. If the super delegates accept those arguments, the Democratic Party will be destroyed. Deservedly so.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Most of the stares that Obama won will not vote
democrat. Get with the education program and pay attention. I for one want the primaries changed. No cross over voting it should be illegal. Thee should ba a set time for each state to have a primary. Screw Iowa and all other caucas states. Primary and no cross over. Independents can go to hell. Make up your mind. This "I vote for the man not the party"is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You're saying since those states don't count in the GE, they shouldn't count in our primary.

That's called disenfranchisement. No need to insult my education or attentiveness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And you know this how?
Crystal ball?

The Democratic Party has spent the last 30 years ignoring certain states and the result is that our party all but handed them to the repukes on a silver platter. If you look at the voting trends in the '60s, you will see the point when the repukes finally woke up and decided to do their "50-state" strategy:

(Red = states won by Johnson, Blue = states won by Goldwater)


And after Goldwater lost like that, they were determined to redo the entire landscape. And they succeeded. And here we are today and it's time for the Democratics to get these folks back. The RW experient has failed and failed miserably. The country and the world is in economic collapse, the environment is only being looked at today because some figured out they could make money out of it, and the ridiculous ideological wars keep coming and coming.

It may take some time but at least the DNC is taking the first steps in reclaiming its rightful place as the "majority Party".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-23-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'd like a closed Primary...
with just those under the bus voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC