|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Cheney Killed Bambi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 03:43 PM Original message |
Even Paul Krugman has Turned Against Hillary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. Awwwwwwwww, Krugman didn't get asked to be on the panel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
42. And Obama voted for the Peru Free Trade Act after the AFL-CIO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:50 PM Response to Reply #1 |
68. if you had a clue you would be lobbying for him to be on a panel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. Krugman's simply taliking about policy- like he always does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. He finally realizes his chance to be a Presidential advisor is going up in flames |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'm still LOLing over the Krugman piece I found last week about NAFTA... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. That's good to know..Krugman is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
28. Whoa! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. Swear to GOD...I underlined it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
39. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:10 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. I'm doing a research paper on the environmental effects of NAFTA on Mexico |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Oooh are you touching on the parts of NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:17 PM Original message |
Yes, I'm really enjoying it...It's for my Economics of the Environment class |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
54. Yes you are! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Eeek! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:39 PM Response to Reply #56 |
67. You're very welcome! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:12 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Don't forget to add Obama's support of NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bicentennial_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #44 |
51. It's an Economics paper, not relevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. Krugman was never a Hillary supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. GMAFB. Krugman has been majorly kissing Clinton ass this whole election season |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. except for all the time when he was a Edwards supporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Pretending to support Edwards, you mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. maybe he was on the fence a little |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. You're so blind by your support for Saint Obama that you can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Oh okay, was Krugman neutral or was he for Edwards? Can't have it both ways. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. I think he leaned Edwards because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
32. Of the big 3, he was most complimentary of Edwards and his more populist policies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Paul Krugman luuuuurves free trade. Edwards was becoming increasingly outspoken against it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. And Krugman in a recent interview with Thom Hartmann on AAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:17 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. IOW, Krugman has the same position on free trade as Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #40 |
50. 15 years after the fact he's for controls. Big stinkin' whoop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:17 PM Response to Reply #37 |
48. Paul Krugman's economic views are much more complex than you give him credit for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #48 |
62. II don't use pejoratives for HRC supporters so I'd appreciate you showing me some basic courtesy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. Ezra Klein: Obama vs Krugman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:55 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Aaaaand that has what to do with free trade? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. "Arguably the most progressive voice in American media." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 06:09 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Wev. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. yes, he was a major Clinton supporter but I guess Greenspan was too much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Yet I have a feeling that if Hillary were the presumptive nominee right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Where's your proof that Krugman wanted a "Sweet spot" in the Clinton Admin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:45 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Generally speaking, when someone prefaces a statement with "I have a feeling" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. "ooops".. I think she's more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. No, I have more RESPECT for Krugman than I do Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:15 PM Response to Reply #36 |
47. Paul Krugman luuuuurves him some free trade, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #47 |
61. Really! People see what they wanna |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:38 AM Response to Reply #61 |
81. Sorry, zidzi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:23 PM Response to Reply #36 |
59. Riiiight..Bad Obama Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. "Obama bot"? Please..can't you make |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:06 PM Response to Reply #24 |
38. I have to differentiate between Obama fanatics and lukewarm obama supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #38 |
58. Because no movement has ever succeeds like the one with a lot of lukewarm supporters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:34 AM Response to Reply #58 |
80. No slogan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:24 PM Response to Reply #38 |
60. Obama BOT here and proud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #13 |
63. More from the land of make believe.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Hogwash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. Ironic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. You must not understand the concept of irony |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihavenobias (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. I understand it just fine actually as I hadn't read post # 2 at the time I created my comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. No I won't GYAFB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Bullshit. He "supported" Edwards so he could Obama-bash with impunity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:57 PM Response to Reply #15 |
30. Krugman never endorsed ANYONE -nor could a rational person reading his columns think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #30 |
45. Relentless bashing is more like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. It's only "bashing" if you don't like what's said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #53 |
65. Not sure how well you read posts. There's not a single thing in that oped about HEALTHCARE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #65 |
72. Crikey! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. AT THIS TIME McCain is the Republican nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 06:43 PM Response to Reply #65 |
73. I don't have the links, but I remember reading Krugman said to expect nothing from the Repubs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 06:59 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. He needs to do a little more than say "expect nothing" to maintain his credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. Because McCain doesn't bill his proposal as getting health care to everyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 07:13 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Well it gets my goat when people tell me that a mandate is universal coverage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:43 AM Response to Reply #77 |
82. Mccain wasn't a major factor at the time Krugman criticized Obama's plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #77 |
85. Single-payer is what I prefer, but in laymen's terms universal simply means everyone is covered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
55. Yes so he cleverly spent a whole year praising Edwards. That wily bastard! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. Thanks for getting the record straight on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rinsd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #22 |
52. Only blind supporters consider the record set straight sans evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. When Krugman has given up surely it is over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
19. About freakin' time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
27. Hahahahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
34. what next, will Joe Wilson wake up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheney Killed Bambi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 07:55 PM Response to Reply #34 |
79. He wants a State Department position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
35. I had a feeling that would end the love affair. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
46. Krugman's not alone in this reaction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. Well a certain DUer who speaks "as someone in the banking industry" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
64. HA HA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-26-08 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
78. They disagree on something. Most people do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
83. Here's what DUers often miss: It's NOT all black and white |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-27-08 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
84. She wants a damn commission for everything... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC