This is very interesting coming from Chuck Todd. He was very biased towards Obama up through Feb 5th (which kind of peaked in NH, when he was flustered and said the only real way Clinton could have won was due to the Bradley effect/racism). Since Feb 5th (and especially since March 4th) he has been more neutral. In any case, I don't think anyone would claim he is biased towards Clinton, so this carries some weight. A good analysis.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23846166/--snip--
The party ought to lay off the calls for Clinton to drop out, at least for now, because her presence at worst is making Obama a better candidate. The Wright flare-up was the first true political crisis of Obama's national political career, which is remarkable given how close he is to being the Democratic nominee. Who knows when the Wright controversy would have circulated had the nomination been locked up.
Obama needed to prove he could handle a real media firestorm, something Clinton has done numerous times throughout her career. In fact, her political survival skills have been marketed as an asset by the campaign, something I think would have sold better in '04 when the party was looking for a tough survivor to put up against Bush.
The constant reminder to Democrats about Clinton's ability to handle firestorms has played into Obama's "turn the page" message. There is a large chunk of Obama supporters who are with him because they are exhausted from the political firefights of the last 20 years.
Of course, the Clinton campaign would argue that these folks are being naïve if they think partisan bickering goes if Obama is elected. However, as many have noted, an electorate in a change election wants to feel optimistic and Obama is providing that optimism right now.
--snip--