and asked that they forward it to Ms. Polier.....
Dear New York Magazine Editors,
I felt a lot of sympathy for the young woman, Alexandra Poiler, while reading her story of how she became the center of a nasty rumor linking her to Senator John Kerry. It appears that Ms. Poiler was the victim of a circular rumor mill which seems to include many offenders in the media as well as her very close friend (so sad). Additional victims to be included should be Senator Kerry and General Wes Clark. I include these two men, because it appears that they did not commit the deed(s) that they have also been accused of within the initial sordit rumor.
General Clark, who was fingered as the one to have started the spread of the rumor by Matt Drudge, is still being smeared to-date in the press for his unproven alleged participation. Although journalists who were present at the time of the off-the-record press conference with the General have indeed stepped forward to clear him of the claim that he spoke of an Kerry Intern problem, that rumor lives on. Ryan Lizza, one of those reporters, has since twice written that General Clark did not say what was reported by Drudge. Yet AP's Nedra Pickler and The Boston Globe's Peter Canellos both recently wrote about General Clark and this rumor (in Mid-May!). They were in good company apparently, as they only repeated what they had earlier read in other mainstream publications. Both Jonathan Alter of Newsweek and John Schuster of MSNBC had reported the rumor and that General Clark had spread it. Of course, they used no attribution or sources to back up their claim. Campaign Desk (a project of Columbia's Graduate school of Journalism which is keeping tabs on the accuracy and truth of this election year's political media reporters) investigated this story and it link to Kerry initially and then to Clark on four separate occasions. Both were vindicated; John Kerry of "Hanky Panky", and the General of "Rumor mongering".
Of course, both men have to deal with the fact that this rumor seems to be resurrected each and every month. I can only imagine that the taint of suspicion circling the air in reference to this subject is not a welcome event for either the Senator or the General.
I feel badly that the current day journalist could so enthusiastically report on such unattributed rumors while leaving out much of the facts surrounding the story. An unsubstantiated rumor is just that, and should never be touched by any mainstream media reporter with a 10 foot pole. I just can't understand why this is not a general journalistic rule of ethics. It seems that it would be one of the first lessons to be taught in Journalism 101.
Yours Truly,
<name, address and Phone# here>
PS: I would appreciate it greatly if you could forward this letter to Ms. Polier. I am linking my sources for her perusal in reference to who did what, when and the investigation results conducted by Campaign Desk, a project of the Columbia Graduate School of journalism. Maybe this will shed additional light to her research. Although she unfortunately suffered because of this rumor as an innocent, she was not the only one.
Campaign Desk, a Project of the Columbia Journalism Review at Columbia Graduate School of Journalism
The original Story about the "rumor"......"Drudge, Dickens and the Death Rattle (?) of a rumor"
http://www.campaigndesk.org/archives/000158.aspIn reference to Newsweek's Jonathan Alter's CW - Newsweek Didn't
http://www.cjr.org/blog/archives/cat_fact_check.asp#000194and again to Nedra Pickler "In the Dark on Wesley Clark"
http://www.campaigndesk.org/archives/000543.aspand most recently to Peter Canellos as an answer to his Boston Globe piece,
"the Drudge Report: the Gift that keeps on giving"
http://www.campaigndesk.org/archives/000556.aspRyan Lizza, one of the reporters present of the New Republic initially:
http://www.tnr.com/blog/campaignjournal?pid=1337and Again Ryan Lizza, more recently:
http://www.tnr.com/blog/campaignjournal?pid=1655Nick Confessore of prospect offers his view:
http://www.prospect.org/weblog/as does AmySullivan of Political Aims
http://gadflyer.com/politicalaims/index.php?Week=200407