|
First, Dean's doing something right as far as the "bringing new people into the process" category is concerned. People who have never donated to a campaign, people under 30 giving to a campaign, the number of small donors, press reports of Democratic events being boosted in attendance via new people attending, new participants attending the monthly MeetUps, etc. If this pattern holds, look for larger-than-usual turnout in Iowa and New Hampshire connected to Dean victories. That would be confirmation that these symptoms can be connected to a rise in voter turnout. Dean's been claiming that he can get 3 or 4 million new voters to the polls. If the race comes-down to another 2000-style 50-50 affair, those few extra million votes will come in handy. Very handy.
Second, any of the top-tier contenders are a good gamble because of the huge non-party organizations preparing for this election. George Soros (Americans Coming Together) comes to mind immediately, along with MoveOn. These groups can help us overcome the financial advantage that the Chimp will have over our nominee's campaign. Advertising, get-out-the-vote campaigns in 17 electorally key states, etc. And even if they succeed in bumping-up turnout by a mere 1 or 2%, that could be the difference in November.
Third, the Greens will not be as much of a factor as they were in 2000. Again.. another 1 or 2% could be the difference.
Fourth, Dean isn't as liberal as many would portray him. That 'A' from the NRA is one thing that makes me think he's more electable than some of the other candidates. The NRA was a huge factor in the last election, giving WV to Bush over Gore, and making many Great Lakes states too close for comfort. With the NRA neutered, Dean has a chance to wrap-up most Gore states a bit earlier so that he can concentrate on some swing states.
I think Dean's a decent bet. Anyone we put-up can give Bush a good run for his money. But no matter whom we nominate, we're going to have to work our @sses off..
|