Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

does anyone have a list of states Gore competed for in 2000 ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 09:14 PM
Original message
does anyone have a list of states Gore competed for in 2000 ?
not just states he won, but the ones he campaigned in and put resources in to try to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. The only states Gore competed for in 2000 and lost
Edited on Mon Jun-14-04 10:31 PM by dolstein
were Florida, New Hampshire, Arkansas, Tennessee, Nevada and West Virginia. The Gore campaign wrote off Ohio pretty early -- too early many have argued (albeit with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight). I don't believe that Gore made any real effort in Arizona or Virginia.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Josh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He didn't spend a dime in Arizona or Virginia and they were pretty close -
I think he did campaign in Missouri, but I can't be certain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Absolutely, Gore campaigned in Missouri
Dolstein forgot that one. Otherwise, his list is correct.

The problem was not the isolated states but the emphasis. Gore took Tennessee and West Virginia for granted far too long, and dumped possibly winnable Ohio months before the election. He barely visited up-for-grabs Nevada even though Yucca Mountain was an obvious Bush vulnerability.

It can be argued too much emphasis was placed on Michigan and Pennsylvania, given our eventual margins in those states, but as dolstein indicated that's pure 20/20. I certainly didn't expect those margins.

We tend to forget Gore barely carried states like Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, New Mexico and Oregon. There would be much more DU focus on those states this year if Bush had carried them in 2000. I'm worried one or more might turn into our West Virginia surprise this time.

It can't be denied Gore made pathetic use of Clinton. I remember the Big Dog wasting away in California a week or so before November 7.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Gore kept Clinton away, and he only came to California because state pols
asked him to.

california state politicians asked clinton to come to california even if he doesn't have gore's permission so clinton came here.

good thing kerry is making good use of clinton unlike gore. kerry mentions clinton as much as he can and is working with clinton on how he can help him while promoting his book and talks to him very often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Iowa, Oregon, and Wisconsin
Edited on Tue Jun-15-04 10:26 AM by fujiyama
do worry me. They all within 1%...

Unfortunately, Nader really made Gore divert resources from OH, into states like those above, as well as MN.

Sure enough Bush is putting a lot of money into those three, as well as PA. He's made a lot of trip there, and I believe they view at as the one state most likely to peel away from us.

Another state Gore put too much time and money into was New Jersey, which ended up going for him by 15%.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Gore's effort in Tennessee and West Virginia
I've always felt that Gore's hands were tied in Tennessee. If he started running TV ads or scheduling campaign stops, the press would have churned out article after article about how the Gore campaign was struggling so badly that Gore was in danger of losing his home state. The fact that the Gore campaign was able to effective bury this potential bombshell is pretty impressive. Sure, if he had done more earlier in the campaign, he might have deterred Bush from making a real effort in Tennessee. But given what the difficult choices the Gore campaign faced in the final days of the campaign, I think they made the reasonable decision to focus on Florida, which had more electoral votes and where Gore was running stronger in the polls.

As for West Virginia, the Gore campaign had Byrd cut a television ad for him and Byrd campaigned with Gore in the final days of the campaign. As Byrd noted, this was the first time he had campaigned for a presidential candidate since Kennedy in 1960.

If it weren't for Ralph Nader, who made states like Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, Wisconin and Iowa competitive, I'm sure that Gore would have devoted more time to Tennessee and West Virginia. That's just another thing we have to thank Ralph for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yep, forgot that one.
Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. he should have let Clinton campaign in Arkansas and New Hampshire
for him. arkansas because clinton is from there. and new hampshire because that's where clinton became the "come back kid" and picked up momentum to help win the election when many thought his campaign was over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Gore's campaign considered this
But they found that the "Clinton effect" could not be contained to a single state or a single city. They found that when Clinton campaigned in one state, the national news media would report on it and Gore would actually lose support elsewhere.

I watched many of the post mortem panels on the 2000 campaign, and Gore's campaign staff were adamant that while Clinton was able to energize the base, Clinton hurt Gore -- badly -- among the swing voters he needed to win. Their decision not to have Clinton actively campaign for him was not made on a whim.

People around here don't realize just how toxic Clinton had become among swing voters in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC