Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC to discuss Kerry's VP choice in the next half hour.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 03:14 PM
Original message
MSNBC to discuss Kerry's VP choice in the next half hour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Asking if Kerry has nailed it down to three/
Edited on Wed Jun-16-04 03:39 PM by Anti Bush
I'll :cry: if they only discuss Edwards, Gephardt and Vilsac?(sp)

Damn! No mention of Clark. Said this comes directly comes from the Kerry camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. These are the three
that are going to get pre-scrutinized to death. Then Clark will look like the hero on the white horse. heh.

Look I don't think these pundits have a g-damn clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Right before this CNN said it was down to Clark and Edwards!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Hope your right! Then the wolves will be .
off Clark till he announces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Well here's hoping it's not Vilsack
He's a nice guy and all but not the guy I'd want as my VP. I saw him at the Iowa JJ dinner last year and he actually forgot part of the Pledge of Allegiance which he was leading (and no "Under God" wasn't the line).

Then this Saturday he was extremely boring at the WI State Convention. I mean sure both he and Gov. Doyle were a letdown after Feingold's fiery speech, but Vilsack was just dragging and a lot of people left his speech early and he was the Kerry Surrogate for the event.

So my opinion is, nice guy, but not my choice at all.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. MSNBC doesn't know anything you don't know
Edited on Thu Jun-17-04 10:38 AM by Cheswick
all this speculation is ridiculous.
Remember when Cheney picked him self and Gore picked Lieberman? Both were a suprise.
When Reagan chose Bush it was a surprise. When Bush chose Mr Potatoehead it was a surprise.
Don't sweat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. The whore press talks up Edwards nonstop, and then...
lo' and behold, the polls favor Edwards. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceProgProsp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. The pols favor him too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wjsander Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is great.
So funny. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. So, what did they say? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They said
That the Kerry campaign has leaked out that the three choices are pretty much down to Edwards, Gep, and Vilsak. It was the chief political correspondent for MSNBC, can't remember his name right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Interesting...
Right about the same time, I was listening to a CNN discussion that seemed to think it was down to Clark and Edwards. But the CNN guy admitted it was pure speculation. He also said that there are only handful of people (as in, "count on one hand") outside of Kerry and Johnson who know anything at all.

Those who know don't talk and those who talk don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Leaking that means they have chosen Clark.
Good! They are trying to tamp down the fact that Clark's name has crept in the discussed mix. The eventual pick always has to be a "big surprise."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sam Nunn?
ABC WNT reported that Kerrey met with Gephardt (please no) and Vilsack (sorry.......the name) was in DC but would not comment and said reporters should ask Kerrey about his conversations and whom he met with.

Edwards is still seen as the front runner, according to ABC.

The report then stated that ABC had learned from the lead of the VP search Jim Johnson that the VP candidate need IMMEDIATE National Security credentials/name recognition.

Graham
Nunn..............NUNN? Oh brother that could be IT comparable to a McCain choice
William Cohen-not a bad choice
Clark

Wow Nunn????????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. This clinches it for me.
The report then stated that ABC had learned from the lead of the VP search Jim Johnson that the VP candidate need IMMEDIATE National Security credentials/name recognition.

There's ONE person in the running who qualifies with immediate National Security credentials/name recognition.

Wes Clark. It has to be him. I'm not worried. Vilsak??? Does he have National Security credentials? Governor of Iowa? :shrug: Sam Nunn??? Now there's a blast from the past. Out of the blue...Sam Nunn? Nope. Won't be him. Edwards? Does he have immediate National Security credentials? Nope...he does not. Gephardt? Does HE have National Security credentials> maybe, but it won't be him because he's a BIG HUGE YAWN! :boring: AND Gep didn't do very well in the primaries. Clark, on the other hand, has a HUGE grassroots movement and has ALL of the needed credentials to immediately start his new job as VP. Yup, it's Clark. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 03:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Sam Nunn, the homophobe?
I seriously doubt that Kerry would stoop so low as to pick such an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Once again, I predict...
The pundit's will be wrong. They always are about the VP pick. Always. Bank on it, it's got all the precedent in the world. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Yup
I don't remember a presidential campaign where either the pundits or public opinion was correct in the selection of the running mate, and most of the time the person chosen was either a totally unknown person, or the person on the shortlist that the public least expected to be given the job. If you think back, Gore was not given much chance, as both he and Clinton were southerners. Dan Quayle, virtually unknow outside of his own region. George HW Bush...Mondale, Gerald Ford, Spiro Agnew, Hubert Humphrey. Most of these people were not much thought of by the public or the pundits prior to their actual selection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-16-04 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ah, but I just read on my WC2004 digest that Inside Politics proclaimed
that while Clark had a couple of days of meetings with Kerry in DC, and Kerry had met Gep, but not Tom V., Edwards has no meetings scheduled this week in DC.

And, in a post I just made awhile ago, we see that Clark did a conference call on Tuesday (yesterday) arranged by the Kerry campaign slamming Bush on Afghanistan (post-Karzai pressconference) and Iraq.

Now, the question becomes: has Kerry been informing those in these meetings that they aren't the pick, and saving a meeting with Edwards later to seal the deal???

Frankly, being tired of all this, and getting suckered by this...I'm just going to stick to my original prediction, months ago, that the deal was sealed then with Clark...

Whose doing the heavy lifting out there? Clark. If he isn't the one, it will be an incredible letdown and I will seriously question Kerry's judgment and ability to fend off the establishment hounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wjsander Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Edwards is meeting with Kerry today
Just thought I should clearify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC