|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 12:08 AM Original message |
Fact Check: Al Gore did NOT win a majority of the popular vote in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmoney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
1. Picky picky... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cidliz2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 12:12 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Ditto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DBoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 12:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. "more votes than Bush" is correct and to the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flutter by (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
3. Yeah, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 01:53 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Plurality is librul for "Sore Loserman" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TSIAS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
5. Understood |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 01:55 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Its the "winner take all" electoral system that is undemocratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dolstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 02:16 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Actually, I think it depends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalpragmatist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 06:01 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. BY congressionsal districts, Bush would've won. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 07:01 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. You Are Correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LimpingLib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 07:08 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. like 234-191 going by memory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leyton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 08:46 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. But if electoral votes were apportioned to states based on the House, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinanator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 09:25 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. IF they counted the votes he would be in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaoar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-11-04 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
13. Some for instances... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC