Question: If we say the winner of each state gets that states electorial votes, who would be ahead?
LiberalArkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:43 PM
Original message |
Question: If we say the winner of each state gets that states electorial votes, who would be ahead? |
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message |
spin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Edited on Tue May-06-08 07:17 PM by spin
|
Fearless
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message |
2. It doesn't matter. The rules are the rules regardless. |
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
26. and bugger the voters? |
enki23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:45 PM
Original message |
if we say each state allocates delegates according to what its highest grossing porn star says... |
cottonseed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Tue May-06-08 06:46 PM by cottonseed
He'd win more hypotheticals than Hillary would win -- hypothetically.
|
End Of The Road
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
Kittycat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It doesn't matter - We aren't republicans. |
gmudem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They would say the Lieberwoman campaign needs to stop whining and follow the rules as she agreed to them in the first place.
|
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
7. What is it with Hillary supporters and inability to do math - |
|
Obama is ahead and NC has more delegates than Indiana. Try to add it up, Einstein.
|
AZ Criminal JD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
21. Try a course in reading comp. You won't look so foolish. |
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. And inability to stay on topic. |
|
We aren't writing essays here, bamalib. We are talking about politics and delegates. Try to keep up.
|
gmudem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Tue May-06-08 06:48 PM by gmudem
|
cui bono
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
9. No hypothetical questions please. |
leeman67
(535 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
10. If rats had wings, they'd be bats. |
Connie_Corleone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
11. If monkeys flew out my butt... |
|
It doesn't matter. The Democratic Party rules call for proportional delegates.
|
LiberalArkie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I am sorry, but I thought in the end (The General) that was what mattered. |
Aloha Spirit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Different rules means different games, different strategies. Pointless question. |
DemGa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
Lucky 13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
JerseygirlCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
17. That's just not a logical measure |
|
They won't be competing against one another in the general. Head to head comparisons now are very different from a contest against McCain then.
There's no chance that say, NY or CA will be going GOP, is there?
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Notice that Obama fans can't answer that simple question. Just nasty snark.
|
nsd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We've let the Clinton campaign get away with proposing bullshit rule changes for long enough.
It's time for us to say: No, it's over.
|
woolldog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
20. And if my Aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle.... |
spin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Rasmussen Reports April 03 on your question |
Alexander
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message |
23. President Gore would've given us a 50-state landslide in 2000. |
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Good question. And the answer is....? |
Hamlette
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-06-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message |
27. what do you do with the states where there were more than two candidates? |
|
Like Iowa where Hillary came in last.
And changing the rules at the end of the game is unfair.
Obama might have run a different race had that been the measure.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 06:57 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.