Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC: General Jones for Obama's VP?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:14 AM
Original message
MSNBC: General Jones for Obama's VP?
First Read had an interesting piece on Obama's VP search this morning: MSNBC

"So you think you know who's on Obama's veep short list? Well, think again. According to sources on the Hill, Obama veep vetters -- specifically Jim Johnson and Eric Holder -- have been asking Dem members of Congress this week their input about potential running mates. The conversations are free-flowing but one name the vetters are inserting in the conversations is one that is not a household name... Ret. Gen. James Jones, the former Marine-turned-NATO Supreme Allied Commander."

I haven't heard anybody mention retired Marine Gen. James Jones before as a potential Obama VP. I also noticed that Bill Richardson wasn't on their list of people the vetting team is asking about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think that Obama will continue to awe and surprise us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. With the amount of influence the Pentagon has on gov't, I'm leery of....
having someone from the military as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. It's actually the other way around. The Pentagon is forced to do politicians' bidding...
whether it is procurement contracts for weapons they don't want - more C130s from Newt Gingrich's district, for example - or the Iraq War. The Pentagon is usually the dependent, not independent variable in the political equation.

Left to the "Pentagon" - there is a lot of diversity of interests and opinion there - we would NEVER have invaded Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. The fact that the Pentagon sent out military propagada agents....
dressing them up as independent retired military officers, is an indication of how far the military has sunk into Rove/Bush mentality. Also, the way that the generals in charge of Iraq have largely politicized it by their over-the-top spin, even lying to Congress, about the condiions in Iraq is also worrisome, IMO.

I just don't trust the Pentagon anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'm leery of anyone named Jim Jones on an Obama ticket.
;) kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, there is something to say about that., too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. most of the voter don't have a clue what you are referring to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. I hope not!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_L._Jones

"In March 2008, General Jones was nominated to the board of directors of Chevron Corporation. The vote on his nomination will occur at the May 28 annual stockholder's meeting."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
6.  he'd have to resign if so, and he's been on the board 2 months?
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 11:24 AM by Spider Jerusalem
How much can he really have to do with Chevron after 2 months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Who gives a shit how much...
any amount of Chevron is too much. No oil bastards at the White House!

Condi was on the board of Chevron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. I was thinking Gen. Baptiste would be a good choice. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's not his military service I'm leery of
also from the article:

Jones currently is the president and CEO of the Institute for 21st Century Energy, which is an affiliate of the US Chamber of Commerce, not exactly the type of organization a typical Democrat gets involved with. Potentially problematic is that he's on Chevron's board. He also serves on the boards of Boeing and Invacare, a manufacturer and distributor of medical equipment. (Invacare’s slogan, ironically, is: “Yes, you can.”)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. The Chamber is VERY conservative. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. If it is a former general it needs to be Gen. Zinni
Former head of CentCom.
Was against the war.
Was a special envoy for the middle east peace process
Very anti-Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. I have to agree, Zinni would seem to be a perfect fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IA_Seth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'd prefer another former SACEUR!
Gen Wes Clark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Clark brings some issues about his departure at EUCOM that Zinni doesn't have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. yes, some non issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I'm sorry, but I disagree, Clark's departure from EUCOM would become a major issue
I want to be clear that I like Wes Clark and admire him. He is clearly a very bright man and has acheived a lot in his life.

That said the issue over why Clark did not do a full tour as EUCOM CC and Gen Shelton's comments about him would be used by the rethugs mercilessly. I'm not going to argue about whether it is accurate or not, because the rethugs won't care and their media enablers will run with the story.

Zinni brings the same things to the ticket that Clark does but doesn't have any issues about his time a CentCom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. me too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. I understand Senator McCain is considering
General M. A. Ham as his VP to counter!;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
14. No more CNN voiceovers? Cue the "dark side" jokes
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 11:34 AM by underpants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
19. "..impact of the surge, tactical success for both Iraq and coalition forces in the Baghdad Region
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 11:51 AM by 2rth2pwr
has been achieved..." Sept 2007 Gen Jones testifying to congress Sept 2007.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hi9oFHga0LA&


edited to fix link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. That was one of the reports preceding
the Petraeus and Crocker dog and pony show, and from what I remember it was far from laudatory to what was happening in Iraq. Conclusions from that report and from the testimony before the congressional committees were used as arguments against what Petraeus was trying to sell at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbc5g Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. That is correct but the surge failed on political achievements
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 01:01 PM by cbc5g
If you have more troops obviously the violence will calm down, but they can't be there forever and the Iraqi government has squandered the opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
25. Well... they call us Obama supporters "kool aid drinkers"... might as well put a "Jim Jones" on the
ticket.


:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. If they are floating the name, I doubt that he will be the one......
But if he is.....he seems like one tall tough dude!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. I think they are floating the name just because no one knows about him
and they want some input but it isn't a signal he is on the top of the list or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. Completely reasonable - Clark equivalent but close to Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
28. Out of those names.... Webb, Biden, Jones in that order
Jones is unusual but meh' I'd like to learn more about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthAmerican Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. I think Webb is the best choice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC