|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
platosrepublic (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:18 PM Original message |
Nancy Pelosi to urge Judiciary committee NOT to go forward with contempt against Karl Rove. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Nancy, you wouldnt BE in this situation if you had refused to help Bush violate the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:23 PM Response to Original message |
2. Gotta hope Conyers goes for it anyways....He backed off impeachment for her, but Rove should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
3. I'm Shocked! Shocked!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. As if Pelosi hasn't already embarrassed herself and the Democratic Party enough?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Why??? What is her Reasoning??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
99th_Monkey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:33 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. No one's telling who really knows, but rumor has it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:34 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Nancy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaStrega (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #14 |
34. ack. you beat me to it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. With this move I am now certain that she does not qualify as a Democrat .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. I can almost accept that she was against impeachment because of so many bluedogs in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
7. And what exactly is the "firm confirmation"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 10:31 AM Response to Reply #7 |
50. Who cares? Just start screaming and pulling your hair out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
8. WTF!? WHY!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
9. Pelosi is complicit. They have the goods on her... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
simmonsj811 (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
31. They have the goods on her... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. For what fucking conceivable REASON? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc4bo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:31 PM Response to Original message |
11. Claude Hammercy this is getting beyond ridiculous!!! She's gotta go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spartan61 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. After the election, will she still be Speaker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 11:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
35. Deleted message |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. What Orwellian nightmare is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KaryninMiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
17. Is it possible-- just maybe- that she is concerned that he'll be pardoned by Bush if they bust him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt... So if Shrub pardons turd blossom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
18. Nancy Pelosi jumped into bed with Bush the night after we won the 2006 elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
19. No honest person would stand for this outrage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
21. What reason could she possibly be giving the Judiciary Committee for this stance? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
22. All of this time, both on FISA and stuff like this, my rage has been directed at this Woman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
23. I love how this unsubstantiated bullshit works. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bjorn Against (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
24. Maybe she can censure MoveOn again instead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissDeeds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
25. This is sickening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldieAZ49 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:46 PM Response to Original message |
26. Wow, what a difference Democratic leadership in Congress makes, they could be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 01:54 AM Response to Reply #26 |
44. And their public approval ratings reflect that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:49 PM Response to Original message |
27. Has anyone confirmed this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 12:44 AM Response to Reply #27 |
40. That is interesting, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconicgnom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 02:02 AM Response to Reply #27 |
47. I never liked that "could" caveat that I noticed right away. It's such a typical maneuver |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
samsingh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
28. why the fuck not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
29. Pelosi is sounding more like Lieberman every day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
30. Can't you recall a congressman? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
32. Exactly why is it that we can't get rid of Pelosi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaStrega (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
33. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tibbiit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
36. Its simple... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bullet1987 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
37. Nancy Pelosi has been horrible at the position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 01:42 AM Response to Reply #37 |
43. The worst. She might as well be Condi. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
38. Nancy is being bribed ?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 01:01 AM Response to Reply #38 |
41. You know what, kentuck? I bet they have some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
39. Here's a petition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 01:55 AM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Whatever shady dealings that are going down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 02:22 AM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Oh, she's in it up to her neck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RNdaSilva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
42. The incarnation of Ethel Rosenberg? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 01:57 AM Response to Original message |
46. Man, I should write some unsubstantiated bullshit rumors. It'd be fun to watch the netroots jump |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. who is blackmailing you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
49. She must be being blackmailed. And we will never know anything about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4themind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
52. This is incompetence (if true) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4themind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 10:49 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. I'd also like to see this "firm confirmation" before making further judgement-nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
53. Pelosi is just the biggest disappointment going... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
55. Did she secretly have his love child, or what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC