|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:50 PM Original message |
In all sincerity, explain to me how my thinking on this is wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr.Phool
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. He's trying to win back Liebermans love. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
2. This isn't about "purity," or "concern trolling." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Maybe you should go start four or five more irrelevant vanity threads, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. what is so bad about pork grease? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:54 AM Response to Reply #15 |
27. I had pork grease just tonight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
3. This isn't about "purity," or "concern trolling." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. So true that it DESERVED to be said twice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. No it isn't about purity or concern trolling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:54 PM Response to Original message |
5. The balloon being floated reads that he'll fix it all up right AFTER he's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 04:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
35. That should go down really well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
6. Maddy, if you really want to know, and not just to argue with us here, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:20 AM Response to Reply #6 |
16. Shouldn't votes reflect positions on issues? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. It's more complicated than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
7. He could have just NOT voted on the damn thing, I want to know why he went out of his way to cast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:56 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Then maybe you should ask him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jul-09-08 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. Deleted sub-thread |
PM7nj
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
11. Can't let go, eh? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
13. There is a 3rd possibility. His co-campaign chair, Daschle, is a telecom lobbyist. Maybe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:07 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Jesus...I don't even want to consider that that could be a possibility. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
17. Maybe you should read the FISA or if you get second hand information some of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cookie monster
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
18. Don't ask me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newshues
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
20. Bare in mid that Obama's position on FISA changed after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:45 AM Original message |
You may be right. Randi Rhodes and Mike Malloy both said that there is an article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:39 AM Response to Original message |
21. Congrats and a major THANK YOU to 'Hillary' for her vote today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:41 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. My candidate is Barack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 01:15 AM Response to Reply #22 |
30. Right back at ya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigBearJohn
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 04:19 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. How sweet. Thanks for the mention chknltl ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LowerManhattanite
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
23. Not worth it. Waste of time. Trying to end 8 years of GOP rule in the WH instead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
24. Yes, actually it IS about "purity" and "concern trolling." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:48 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Dunno. They keep screaming about Constitutional Rights, I thought I lost those to Patriot Act I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 12:53 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. The people screaming don't seem to actually know what the bill DOES. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 01:09 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I certainly do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 01:08 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. You do realize that the Patriot Act expanded FISA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 01:19 AM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Those of us who READ the USPA understand that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib2
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 02:47 AM Response to Original message |
32. I'll give a lil old vote for possibility 2 in the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Thu Jul-10-08 04:25 AM Response to Original message |
34. He agrees with the majority of it, yes. Claims of "damage to the Constitution" are ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC