|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Political Heretic
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:00 AM Original message |
Peace, My Bretheren...and erm...Sisteren -- A Soothing Report on Latest Poll Good News! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
1. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
2. And your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:32 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Deleted message |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Deleted message |
skooooo
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Wow you're really articulate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. where did he say we can sit back and relax and no need to worry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MGKrebs
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I asked what the point was because I didn't see one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. a post like yours wasn't going to generate "discussion" but offense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. It wasn't even an angry response. I just said there's no need to be a jerk about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Called you a name. Right. I said "no need to be a jerk about it" Wow.... OUCH. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. There shouldn't be anything wrong with saying that there's no need to be a jerk in your responses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
3. Economics will decide it for people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Probably true, but there is a lot of time between now and the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
9. Keep pounding! They are trying to manage a cheat! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
10. And _Newsweek_ is apparently saying that Obama's numbers are down, he is in a dead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mucifer
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. even if it is not close they will use the race card to explain how the polls will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC