Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Colbert, Stewart & Maher comment on the New Yorker cover & reaction (in NYT article)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
highplainsdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:44 PM
Original message
Colbert, Stewart & Maher comment on the New Yorker cover & reaction (in NYT article)
Edited on Mon Jul-14-08 11:47 PM by highplainsdem
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/us/politics/15humor.html

Mr. Colbert said in a telephone interview that a running joke on his show has been that Mr. Obama is a “secret Muslim”; the New Yorker cover, he said, was consistent with that. “It’s a completely valid satirical point to make — and it’s perfectly valid for Obama not to like it,” he said.

Mr. Colbert said he had been freer to poke fun at Mr. Obama than other late-night hosts because “my character on the show doesn’t like him. I’m expected to be hostile to him.”

Mr. Stewart, who is also an executive producer of “The Colbert Report,” said the Obama campaign’s reaction to the New Yorker cover seemed part of what is now almost a pro forma cycle in political campaigns. “Nothing can occur without the candidate responding,” he said.

Bill Maher, who is host of a politically oriented late-night show on HBO, said, “If you can’t do irony on the cover of The New Yorker, where can you do it?”



Those comments are from page 2 of a more general article about the difficulty comedians have coming up with jokes about Obama. I'm quoting those rather than the start of the article because there have been so many threads here about the New Yorker cover.

Threads I haven't commented on because (1) the cover is obviously satire, (2) it's clumsy enough satire there was bound to be outrage over it, and (3) the backlash against that image, and the discussion of what's wrong with the cover, are almost certainly helping Obama more than hurting him. After all, anyone foolish enough to take the cover seriously or like it as an attack on him isn't going to vote for him anyway. It is not going to turn any of the independent/moderate voters he needs against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R.
Agreed. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moriah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Doesn't seem to be the best use of the word "irony".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony

I agree with your assessment of the cover to some degree, especially the clumsy part.

It was really, really clumsy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC