Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama’s Iraq Flip-Flop? Nope.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 06:56 AM
Original message
Obama’s Iraq Flip-Flop? Nope.
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000002916707&cpage=1

Obama’s Iraq Flip-Flop? Nope.
By Angie Drobnic Holan, Politifact

snip//


For example:

• At a Democratic debate in Hanover, N.H. on Sept. 26, 2007, the late Time Russert pressed Obama as to whether he would have all troops out by the end of his first term. “I think it’s hard to project four years from now, and I think it would be irresponsible. We don’t know what contingency will be out there,” Obama said. “I will drastically reduce our presence there to the mission of protecting our embassy, protecting our civilians and making sure that we’re carrying out counterterrorism activities there. I believe that we should have all our troops out by 2013, but I don’t want to make promises not knowing what the situation’s going to be three or four years out.”

• At a Democratic debate in Cleveland on Feb. 26, 2008, Obama said, “As soon as I take office, I will call in the Joint Chiefs of Staff, we will initiate a phased withdrawal, we will be as careful getting out as we were careless getting in. We will give ample time for them to stand up, to negotiate the kinds of agreements that will arrive at the political accommodations that are needed.”

• At a debate in Philadelphia on April 16, 2008, Obama said, “Now, I will always listen to our commanders on the ground with respect to tactics. Once I’ve given them a new mission, that we are going to proceed deliberately in an orderly fashion out of Iraq and we are going to have our combat troops out, we will not have permanent bases there, once I’ve provided that mission, if they come to me and want to adjust tactics, then I will certainly take their recommendations into consideration; but ultimately the buck stops with me as the commander in chief.”

• On “Meet the Press” on May 4, 2008, Russert asked Obama what he would do if advisers thought “a quick withdrawal” from Iraq would result in genocide. Obama replied, “Of course, I would factor in the possibilities of genocide, and I factored it in when I said that I would begin a phased withdrawal. What we have talked about is a very deliberate and prudent approach to the withdrawal -- one to two brigades per month. At that pace, it would take about 16 months, assuming that George Bush is not going to lower troop levels before the next president takes office. We are talking about, potentially, two years away. At that point, we will have been in Iraq seven years. If we cannot get the Iraqis to stand up in seven years, we’re not going to get them to stand up in 14 or 28 or 56 years.”

Taken in their entirety, Obama’s comments reflect a philosophy of “about 16 months” for withdrawal. He also appears to be willing to take advice from commanders on the ground that might affect the general pace, but not the overall goal of withdrawal. Yet Obama has been artful in his rhetoric. His campaign has clearly emphasized “16 months” when speaking to anti-war audiences and “about 16 months” when answering questions from withdrawal skeptics. But Obama never urged a “precipitous” withdrawal; even a bill he offered in January 2007 that set a deadline for getting out of Iraq contained an exemption for national security.

snip//

Weighing all these statements together, we find the McCain campaign is off-base in saying Obama has changed position. Obama repeatedly said facts on the ground could affect the tactical moves of an overall withdrawal. Obama’s position was not an iron-clad withdrawal timeline in the first place. We find the McCain campaign’s statement that Obama has reversed position to be False.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's all McCain has to run on -
making up stuff about Obama.

He's got no policies of his own that aren't straight out of the Bush playbook so this is all he can do - accuse Obama of flip-flopping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's beyond frustrating that the m$m is ignoring McSame's gaffes,
flip-flops, etc. And there are so many of them! But if his 'fans' are like him, not many use a computer to correct their impressions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. careful getting out as we were careless getting in
There are clips with that message popping up regularly throughout these past two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm gratified to see sources that are actually investigating what Obama
has said instead of blindly believing anything McSame says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC