Obama: "I Strongly Stand By My Plan To End This War"By Greg Sargent - July 15, 2008, 12:06PM
Now that Barack Obama has just wrapped up his big Iraq speech, it's worth noting how big a gamble he's taken at key moments during this race -- by insisting on elevating the discussion to a higher plane than the ordinary tit-for-tat of campaigns.
When Obama was under fire for Reverend Wright, Obama gave a speech in which he asked his audience to think bigger, to rise above the narrow, gaffe-driven debate about Wright and have a real and meaningful discussion about the larger social and historical forces at play.
Now Obama has again done something very similar on Iraq.
John McCain wants the debate between the two men about Iraq to be framed around three narrow assertions: One, he was right about the surge, which has succeeded. Two, that success proves that we can "win" with "honor," rather than "surrender." And three, Obama has "flip-flopped" because he can't guarantee that withdrawal from Iraq won't take 30 seconds longer than his proposed 16 months.
Today, Obama insisted on a much broader framing of the discussion, in multiple ways.
In response to McCain's desire to focus the discussion on who was right about the surge, he asked his audience to imagine what our nation could have accomplished in the days after 9/11, if we hadn't squandered our post-9/11 global good will with an unnecessary invasion of a country that had nothing to do with the attacks. He pointed out that we could have devoted all of our force to hunting down the terrorists responsible for 9/11 and their networks and invested hundreds of billions in seeking alternative energy sources.
In response to McCain's insistence that we can "win" with "honor," rather than "surrender," Obama refused to cede the definition of these terms to his foe.
"They refuse to press the Iraqis to make tough choices, and they label any timetable to redeploy our troops `surrender,' even though we would be turning Iraq over to a sovereign Iraqi government -- not to a terrorist enemy," Obama said, adding that the "accusation of surrender is false rhetoric used to justify a failed policy."
And in what may have been the biggest gamble of all, he asked his audience to stop thinking about what lies ahead in Iraq as a straight choice between victory and defeat...
At some point, a judgment must be made. Iraq is not going to be a perfect place, and we don't have unlimited resources to try to make it one. We are not going to kill every al Qaeda sympathizer, eliminate every trace of Iranian influence, or stand up a flawless democracy before we leave -- General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker acknowledged this to me when they testified last April.
In fact, true success in Iraq -- victory in Iraq -- will not take place in a surrender ceremony where an enemy lays down their arms. True success will take place when we leave Iraq to a government that is taking responsibility for its future - a government that prevents sectarian conflict, and ensures that the al Qaeda threat which has been beaten back by our troops does not reemerge. That is an achievable goal if we pursue a comprehensive plan to press the Iraqis stand up.
And finally, in response to McCain's claim that Obama has flip-flopped on whether to leave, Obama reiterated his support for withdrawal in 16-months, adding: "I strongly stand by my plan to end this war."
Obama did not back off his commitment to withdrawal one bit today. Rather, he doubled down on it. In a big, big way.
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/07/obama_i_strongly_stand_by_my_p.php