|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:34 AM Original message |
In satirical payback, Obama camp denies New Yorker writer plane seat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David__77
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
1. That's funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:43 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It's not an insult to The New Yorker... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
3. Unfortunately, this just gives more attention to Lizza's story on Obama's Chicago background, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. I read that article and didn't find the story to be negative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. His Chicago background plays against the meme that he's a different kind of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. I've no problem with people reading the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. I think the article would be read differently by people who aren't already committed to Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. ooh, townhall! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. LOL. What do they charge people not to have to hear from Fred Thompson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. you sound like you aren't already committed on Obama, once again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. You sound as if you think Democrats can't support Obama and still be aware of how others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stray cat
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
4. If it is an intentional snub, Obama campaign is acting like Bush in award-based access |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yep. If intentional, then it was a bad move, IMO. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1Hippiechick
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. As in keep your friends close, your enemies closer? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. I don't believe in that BS philosophy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1Hippiechick
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
61. Gee, seems like it would be easier to keep an eye on them if they were closer.....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Intentional or not, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. huh.. huh... the Republicans are allowed to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. So it's a good thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:54 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. I don't believe in allowing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
54. 200 people applied for 40 seats. It is a fake story. Don't fall for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #54 |
79. sometimes a cooincidence is just that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
85. Doesn't matter if intentional or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
30. If intentional, GOOD MOVE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
58. Considering how biased the press was in favor of Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
64. 200 applied wtth only room for 40. Don't believe the PUMA/GOP hype. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
82. Agreed, which is why I don't think it was intentional. No matter how much fun it is for the media to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
islandmkl
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
6. the New Yorker doesn't get to travel along?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
7. Just as funny as the New Yorker's biting satire! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFLforever
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
10. What's wrong with the New Yorker - can't they take a joke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
52. heheh. i'm kinda hoping it was intentional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErinBerin84
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
11. agree with others that it would be really shitty if this was intentional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
12. haha!! if its true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
14. If true, that's petty. 'Bush League', literally and figureatively, however it's spelled. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
15. Intentional or not, I like that it makes the New Yorker at least wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
16. We should know by now to take these "stories" with a grain of salt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my3boyz
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
20. Good! Now if he would cancel that interview with Charlie Gibson I would be happy.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
22. Looks like 200 journos applied and only 40 got on, so I wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eyes_wide_ open
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #35 |
59. It doesn't make Obama look bad that way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seasat
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #22 |
42. And Ryan Lizza isn't really as much a reporter as an opinion writer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #22 |
47. Wow, full facts instead of half of the facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Yes, there's enough out there to be annoyed at w/o fabricating more. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
57. I'm sure the media will do their job and report this important information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #57 |
63. That's where I got it from. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #22 |
62. Yes, that's giving Lizza more importance than he probably rates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
65. Yep.. If 200 applied for 200 seats, and only 199 were accepted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
23. With 200 reporters wanting a seat, he should suffer through Lizza. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:56 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Rachel Sklar jumped to the same ridiculous conclusion over at HuffPost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
25. Rachel Sklar (Huffington Post) on "Obama's Revenge": |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErinBerin84
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. eh, I'm kind of skeptical about this still. It's all speculation that this was "pay back", |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Deleted sub-thread |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #25 |
40. Rachel Sklar can take her concern-trolling and shove it up her snooty ass. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Its amazing how this poster is in some ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. I called you delusional because you asked if I am the reporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
27. And who ASSumed that this was a payback? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
33. This was clearly a satirical riff on the airline industry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
34. LOL! You don't mess with Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
36. Jesus, who needs to read FR when folks on DU do such a great job trashing our candidate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
37. Time to redo this toon: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marie26
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
44. That's just petty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. 200 reporters tried to get seats. 40 made it on board. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #45 |
49. Even if it was unintentional, the problem is that the timing makes it look intentional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Who's making this an issue? Why is it an issue? I'm sure if Lizza |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:26 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Exactly. Who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Comments from Joe Gandelman, editor of The Moderate Voice: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:41 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. That's someone spouting off with his opinion, which we all have. I'll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #55 |
66. Gandelman can stuff it up his ass too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #55 |
71. Does not portend smooth press relations. ROFLMAO. It worked wonders for Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 05:11 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. For real. Possibly the dumbest bit of concern trolling I've ever seen. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #49 |
86. put a fucking sock in it already.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
60. Apparently, the New Yorker doesn't get satire when they're the object of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #60 |
67. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. It has its moments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 05:09 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. They pride themselves on their insularity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 05:25 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. I agree with your conclusion, but the tempest in the teapot is still fun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDonkey
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #60 |
78. lol, agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
68. I don't believe anything written about Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVjinx
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:37 PM Response to Reply #68 |
84. So you think the New Yorker DID get on the plane? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
69. 200 applied, 40 got seats. What, he should have gone out of his way to seat him as a reward? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #69 |
76. Of course! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
70. 40 seats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pisces
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
75. there are only 40 seats. THe New Yorker doesn't rank. I have no problem with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
80. Yellow journalism for the gullible. You got conned. 200 applicants, but only 40 seats. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
81. I don't like it if it IS payback -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
83. Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC