|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
LynneSin
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:48 PM Original message |
There is absolutely NO reason any DUer should be advocating a Repub for Obama's VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
1. Add me to that list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
2. You go, girlfriend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. you could edit you title to "There is absolutely NO reason any DUer should be advocating a Repub" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. or advocating failed Republican policies.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
4. Agreed, not even Olympia Snowe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fight4my3sons
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 09:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
62. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrZeeLit
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #4 |
63. She might not even have a senate seat in Nov. She's no choice at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:03 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. I have no problem with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. Agreed. Too bad the political neophytes here don't know any better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DinahMoeHum
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. Agreed. The "worst" Democrat is still a thousand times better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebel with a cause
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #7 |
25. I am against a republican as VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
8. K&R Absolutely agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbtries
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #8 |
75. or faces charges by and by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:59 PM Response to Original message |
9. Hell there's even a lot of so called "Democrats" that shouldn't be considered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Don't think Jeffords is a Rethug anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kmac3
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 09:33 AM Response to Reply #9 |
61. Great observation and comment . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
83. Agree . . . DLC Democrats should be out for VP --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. No Republicans On the Democratic Ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graywarrior
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
11. Damn right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeaLyons
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
12. Agree with you 100% & |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riona
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
13. I'm with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
14. Lincoln Chafee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I heard rumors that he changed party but I would still say "NO" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
desktop
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #15 |
68. Chafee officially left the GOP, now an official independent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #14 |
32. He's a bit of a dweeb. OK, a big dweeb. I can't see that as a ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #14 |
34. For a Cabinet position, maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:34 PM Response to Reply #34 |
84. Let's also keep the GOP out of Cabinet and other agency positions . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
16. Especially not when we have so many wonderful possibilities! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DutchLiberal
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:38 AM Response to Reply #16 |
71. Kucinich isn't going to happen but Gravel is a possibility? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
85. I like the idea of a female VP --- and Barbara Boxer is good . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #16 |
97. You equate Gravel with Kucinich and Barbara Boxer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #97 |
104. Not all that strange. Strongly liberal/libertarian, but has a reputation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 08:56 PM Response to Reply #104 |
109. So, you really like libertarians? You also think Ron Paul is in the same category as Kucinich and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 09:11 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. You think Gravel is in the same category as Paul? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. Libertarian is as libertarian does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 01:02 AM Response to Reply #97 |
113. Brainfart on my part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
17. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sshan2525
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
19. Exactly..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
solara
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
20. Amen. Amen. Amen. Amen. Amen. Amen. Amen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
21. F'in A. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
22. I can't imagine it actually happening, But that aside, I am with you 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
23. Agreed. Hagel's right on a couple of issues, but he's "RIGHT" on most issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
24. there's only a handful or so of these kinds of thinkers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
26. THANK YOU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
27. VP would certainly be going too far. Apart from additional concerns for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
28. I'm generally opposed to Obama selecting a GOP for VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goletian
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
29. absurd. that is not change! omg change change change!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malik flavors
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
30. To bad Obama's the democratic nominee, and it doesn't matter what you might want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnionPatch
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
31. There's a reason they call themselves Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
33. Right on! EOS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
35. Just ignore that horseshit, LynneSin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Awsi Dooger
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
36. Yeah, I don't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
37. DUers just like republicans. Once you get used to that fact, everything becomes easier. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #37 |
88. Yeah . . . I've noticed that, but many want to keep that a bit hidden . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LVjinx
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
38. You got that right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
39. None. Hagel has been an enabler of the bush admin before it become less fashionable... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
40. You're preaching to the choir with me, Sissie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:13 PM Response to Original message |
41. No Chuck Hagel. No Sam Nunn.Those two are dealbreakers for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #41 |
66. Totally ditto |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sparkly
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
42. No harm in "advocating" here, I suppose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
43. Those threads piss me off... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
44. who starts these rumors? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
45. Amen Miss Delaware |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 05:18 PM Response to Reply #45 |
107. Uh oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. you said it first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
46. Let's show Sensitivity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nam78_two
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
47. Agree completely-Kicked and Recommended |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
48. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spiffarino
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 01:03 AM Response to Original message |
49. Look up John Tyler and see how that worked out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chknltl
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
50. Are we discussing THIS cHuckster hagel????: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 01:32 AM Response to Original message |
51. THANK YOU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suffragette
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
52. There are so many talented and capable Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
53. I've said this before. You're Veep is like your "boy or girl" someone who got your back... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 07:32 AM Response to Original message |
54. Maybe Hagel could fix his voting machines for an Obama win this time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
racaulk
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
55. No argument here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniorPlankton
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
56. There is absolutely NO reason you should tell any DUer what to advocate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 09:09 AM Response to Reply #56 |
58. "we are civilized enough to discuss even the most nonsensical ideas" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 05:15 PM Response to Reply #56 |
106. Lynne is right: it's DEMOCRATIC Undergorund |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
57. Sad this has to be said. With the way they've run things... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 09:21 AM Response to Original message |
59. Agreed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
60. 110% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
65. Totally agree -- but there is A reason why some DUers do and that's to give |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Larkspur
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
67. I agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
69. Not even Abe Lincoln? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:30 AM Response to Original message |
70. For another thing, wouldn't it be against the DU rules? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
72. I agree 100%, however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellerpup
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
73. I'll back you on that proposition! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud progressive
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
74. though i share your hatred for anything republican right now, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #74 |
86. You think we need a REPUG on the ticket to "win" in November . . . ??? !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philosophie_en_rose
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
76. What the hell? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud progressive
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #76 |
77. be careful: some of you are beginning to sound self-righteous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philosophie_en_rose
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. OH NOES!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud progressive
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #80 |
91. imagine that! you! being judged! must be a wannabe republican!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #77 |
105. Self righteous? Isn't that another term for "proud"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #76 |
82. About 2 years ago on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GihrenZabi
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
78. Abraham Lincoln... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
79. "Appeals to Republicans..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlingBlade
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
81. What kind of a Democrat would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #81 |
103. The picture no one sees... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreepFryer
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
87. Agreed. This is the latest Freeper division ploy. The next President/Congress will be strongly Dem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
89. And is McCain going to pick a DEMOCRAT for his VP . .. maybe a blue dog? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
90. Not even Lieberman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedLetterRev
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
92. And for the politically incorrect question du jour... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
93. Have to admit I'm a little baffled by the anxiety on display lately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud progressive
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. and do not forget human nature. power corrupts - even DEMOCRATS!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #93 |
111. Yep, it would be Obama's administration- right up until the point he's murdered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. Well, I didn't advocate for anyone specifically for VP in my post, just defending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
95. Assassination insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbolink
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
96. Yes there is a reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 02:04 PM Response to Original message |
98. One quibble |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
99. Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
100. In complete agreement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
101. Well, maybe the rethuglican moles on DU would have a reason to do so. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GalleryGod
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
102. The Difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC