|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Hawkeye-X
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:26 PM Original message |
Take a look at this AF-1 and tell me it friggin' needs to retire and replaced with this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. Would be Nice to have a Green AF-1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. How about they just cancel the whole thing & charter one when they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. I agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I used to be impressed with shit like that, until I started paying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
3. If I'm remembering correctly, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 07:08 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. What if it's an Airbus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I don't think they'd take the chance politically. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:45 PM Response to Original message |
6. AF-1 is a taxicab with wings. Let them rent a plane when it's really needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. It has to serve as an airborne WH if needed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monomach
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Youphemism
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. No... It needs to be replaced with *this*: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 09:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Right on! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mloutre
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Yeah! O- Force One! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
12. "787-8 will use 20% less fuel than any other current airplane of its size" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
14. The 747 is not being phased out. The 747 and the 787 are different planes for different routes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC