Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It doesn't get more pathetic to realize that Jack Cafferty is the most sensible

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 05:35 PM
Original message
It doesn't get more pathetic to realize that Jack Cafferty is the most sensible
Edited on Tue Jul-22-08 05:38 PM by grantcart
guy on TV (besides Rachel and KO).


"The surge is over and McCain should just get over it and work on getting our people out"



"We lost 4,000 and trillions of dollars and the economy is in the toilet and all McCain can talk about is the surge - get over it already - it was an illegal war and there were no weapons of mass destruction and McCain thinks he can lead this country by talking about only one thing - the surge - its ridiculous"


Unbelievable that we have been reduced to having Jack Cafferty as the sole remaining voice of reason - beyond the two exceptions mentioned above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
World Citizen Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've been listening to Jack for years
when he was in NY. One thing I have to say about him is that he is not a whore. He really believes what he says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speciesamused Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. He should have his own show. He
is way better than Wolf Blitzer.
I just adore Jack. He is always so calm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. he really went after that idiot Borger, who went on and ON about how
Obama won't admit he was wrong about the surge because it's "WORKING!"

it is? says who?

funny how she didn't mention that McCain was completely and utterly wrong about the war in the first place.

Cafferty just tore her up with stats about the overWHELMING concern of the public vis a vis the importance of the economy, rather than the war, and how McCain needs to "stop WHINING" about the press coverage

I'd love to see him argue with dobbs, whose show tonight is going to center around the 'media love' for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. That Lady Is Insufferable...
Someone refered to Mrs. Greenspan as being a gossip...that also really describes this "babe" (used as a perjorative). Nothing she says is based on any real reporting...she plays "telephone"...spreading gossip that is generally both wrong and tone deaf. She eptimoizes the beltway bubble...living in their own world of self importance and thinking the rest of us really give a shit.

Sadly, this babe cashes in with a nice corporate paycheck. As I keep saying, it's time for some new blood in the punditacracy...this crew has overstayed their welcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. An "illegal war"? How quaint, but far too few Amurikkkans seem to give a flying fuck
about the millions of casualties, those killed, maimed, orphaned, made homeless/jobless, the utter devastation and ruin and the ransacking of ancient artifacts which raises the central question imv: just what kind of people are we anyway when a major news personality labels this war as illegal and no discernible public reaction follows? Ho-hum, let's watch Sportscenter, :shrug: :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. There is only one way to get the masses tuned in - restore the draft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. exactly...
i don't want to need a draft to go start some wars....

but if everybody had to face getting their ass blown up because some neoconazis want to make a couple of billions dollars...things would be a lot different on the street...

this administration's put a burden on a very small segment of our society...the rest of us worry about gas prices, food prices and trying to maintain some 'normal' life...those in the military are being USED and used up...all for the rw military-petro-global $$machine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUlover2909 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. yep - here here - people have become damned selfish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. And with no deferments to the future Cheneyites: let every 'puke household with a son or daughter of
draft age serve their country along with all others. But we know that in the real world, there is no chance of that happening. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. I absolutely agree with you there.
No educational deferments. No deferments period. Both genders should be subject to the draft as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Really, it should be a law that if we go to war there is a draft
Edited on Tue Jul-22-08 08:20 PM by SoonerPride
And no one gets excluded.

No deferments for the rich or college bound.

All in.

If a war is what we really want then we all agree to go fight.

If the war is not what we want, then we don't fight it.

The "volunteer" army caught in this perpetual pseudo draft they have now is criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUlover2909 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. I agree. Send Romney's sons. They support the occupation of Iraq.
I have a good friend that was a college Navy ROTC member. He served and became a Lt. Commander in the Navy. He remained in the Navy reserves. Now he is a grunt in Iraq. Does that make any fucking sense at all? They are taking Navy officers now and making them infantry soldiers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. As someone who knows numerous people, including my own boyfriend, with draft age kids:
I hate to say it but you're right. It's not until Americans are confronted with the possibility of having a personal stake in it that they'll care. The prospect of a draft would definitely get more of the young folks out to vote too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Jack is a curmudgeon's curmudgeon. That's a good thing.
I aspire to such exalted status one day, myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. It is sad that
he is one of the very, very few .... but, in a sense, it isn't surprising. I often disagree with him, but I don't view him as being in the same group as most of the cable journalists. He seems to try to be honest, and has some of the values of "old school" journalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm pretty sure Jack Cafferty is a big Ron Paul fan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I don't think so he is taking the Obama point of view regularly now
and he frequently smacks down the others on camera



Also he has a practical edge that I think would keep him uninterested in any third party candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. You know what? I always wondered how this moment would feel, and I've got it.
It's like when you're the designated driver and you had to sit at the Fish camp watching your friends play a game of 7-14-21 and you see them downing beers, Planters Punches, Gin and Tonics and shots of Tequila, in no particular order, and then they convince you to drive them down to some back alley for tattoos and then after that, to a friends house to do some more drinking. And the next morning you wake up with everybody's vomit all over you because you had to take them one by one to the toilet when they got sick and then they're slowly waking up from their hangovers wondering why they drank so excessively and you're wondering why you ever became friends with them? What did you ever have in common to begin with? Well, living in America today, at this moment in history is like that, only it wasn't one day they were binging, but seven years. That's a long time to be a designated driver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Excellent point..kinda like
rudy and his 9/11 to infinity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. I would like to remind people to watch Democracy Now! hosted
by Amy Goodman. I love and admire the work that both Olbermann & Rachel do, but for my money Goodman must, at the very least, be mentioned in the same breath.

For those of you who have never had the refreshing experience of an excellent news broadcast w/o any fingerprints of the corporate world on it, http://www.democracynow.org/.

If you have Dish TV, Democracy Now! is on FreeSpeach TV. On Comcast, well you have to fish for it. For me (yuk, we currently have nasty comcast) Democracy Now! is broadcast twice a day on a local cable outlet.


I have great regard for Jack Cafferty. Besides the fact that he reminds me of my father's side of the family, Cafferty has been a voice to help keep me sane during the past 7 years. On Fourth of July a few years ago, during a period where the rw was pushing hard homophobia and fear and hatred of Liberalism to drum up support from their base, Cafferty ran a video that he helped produce that showed pics of soldiers/marines in Iraq asking the viewer if it mattered if that soldier was gay or Liberal--would we respect their service and sacrifice any less. It was a very powerful 3 minute video. Cafferty has also, I'm sure against much pressure from the people who sign his checks, been a consistent and outspoken critic of the the crimes against our Constitution and moral decency committed by the bush* administration and their enablers.

I will never agree with Cafferty on everything, but I have deep respect & regard for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUlover2909 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. Cenk Uygur too has the right point of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. I respect a guy who says what he thinks - even if I disagree at times. But he's right on this! -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
20. If the surge "worked" then we should be able to leave right away, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
24. SURGE = ESCALATION by another name
The point of the surge was supposed to be to allow the Iraqis time to meet their objectives in state and military matters, which both the Iraqis and the US military say have occurred. The point was to get ready to turn it over to the Iraqis.

It was George W. Bush who said When they stand up, we'll stand down.

It was George W. Bush who said If the Iraqis ask us to leave, we'll leave.

John McCain has in mind a war without end, because he will never recognize as victory our leaving and going home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC