Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media starting to call McCain out for his BS - on Obama's troop visit and energy.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 08:23 AM
Original message
Media starting to call McCain out for his BS - on Obama's troop visit and energy.
...

In its fact-check of the Landstuhl controversy, the New York Times says the McCain assertion that Obama cancelled his visit because the traveling press corps wouldn’t be allowed into Landstuhl “is not correct, Mr. Obama’s advisers say. Before his visit to Ramstein Air Base, which is near the medical center, was canceled, the plan called for reporters to stay behind at an airport terminal while Mr. Obama and one adviser met with the troops. Why? The Pentagon does not allow reporters and photographers inside Landstuhl. For weeks, Mr. Obama had been planning to visit wounded troops in Germany, just as he did in Afghanistan last week and previously had done at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington. Yet the Landstuhl visit carried more risk because it was to come in the middle of an overseas campaign trip.”

FactCheck.org adds, "A new McCain ad says Obama 'made time to go to the gym, but canceled a visit with wounded troops. Seems the Pentagon wouldn't allow him to bring cameras.' McCain's facts are literally true, but his insinuation -- that the visit was canceled because of the press ban or the desire for gym time -- is false. In fact, Obama visited wounded troops earlier -- without cameras or press -- both in the U.S. and Iraq. And his gym workouts are a daily routine."

And here’s more criticism of McCain’s energy ad from a USA Today editorial: “Even by the elastic standards of political ads, this is more than a stretch. It's baloney. It's also a marker on the path toward the kind of simplistic, counterproductive demonizing that many expect will poison the fall campaign. Perhaps the silliest implication in the ad is that any one person, even a U.S. senator, is singlehandedly responsible for rising gasoline prices. ... The ad is right, at least in our view, in saying more drilling would help. But any implication that drilling alone would solve the energy problem is simply fiction that distracts attention from actually fixing the problem." More: "The pity of misleading ads like this is that McCain and Obama have both shown signs that they can embrace good ideas and elevate the debate. If 'Pump' represents the standard of truth in advertising for this presidential campaign, it's going to be a long and distressingly fact-free three months until Election Day."

...

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/29/1230437.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm glad that McCain had to say he approved that message.
Now he has to be accountable for those sleazy lies.

I have to admit that I used to think he was better than this. But lately I realize he's as much the lying sack of bs as Bush.

He's a liar. What a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think McAnus going negative early only helps Obama. Lets independents see McAnus has ran out of...
...arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-29-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And it shows how desperate he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC