|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
crimsonblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:23 PM Original message |
Question: Was Marijuana legal in 1964? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. I believe it was in Alaska. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not when I was in high school in the early 70's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. she was BORN in 64 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. if she is only 44, she would only be 4 years old in 64 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Left Is Write (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. No, she was an infant in 1964. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. errmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Left Is Write (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 04:20 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. It happens to the best of us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquamarina (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
16. She would have been Zero in 1964 - she was 4 in 1968 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. LOL, I meant I was 4 in 64 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wickerman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
5. Personal use is still legal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Lot of DU'ers are thinking about packing up right about now. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. Those extra long days make for a wonderful growing season! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. LOL No doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
34. If I recall, it was known in the lower 48 as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
90-percent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
6. marijuana illegalness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goodgd_yall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
8. In Alaska, if I understand correctly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
9. I think possession of pot in Alaska became legal in the mid 1970s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crimsonblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. especially since she didn't go to college in Alaska |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I assume she came home for summers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. Here are Alaska's current marijuana laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eShirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
11. wouldn't it have still been a federal offense though? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Left Is Write (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. It's okay, though, because she didn't like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
12. Nope, And Federal Law Supersedes State Law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. so you think the feds should start busting people in Alaska? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Nope, In Fact, I Think It Should Be Legal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. Pretty much every western state with a medical marijuana law disagrees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. I Believe The Feds Would Disagree With You nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. And 10+ years of court cases and political wrangling haven't cleared the matter up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
32. For what its worth, she didn't claim it was legal under federal law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobd0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
18. No, marijuana has NOT been legal in the USA in Palin's lifetime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Left Is Write (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Gee. You'd think the governor would know this informaiton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. and why does her statement make this interesting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Obama Didn't Claim It Was Legal. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. and she acknowledged that it wasn't legal under federal law too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mwb970 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
22. Did she say what she didn't like about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobd0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. It made her feel good and for a Republican woman that's verboten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
37. I Think She Said It Made Her Pregnant nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
38. I dont, the three times I tried it tossed my cookies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwyjibo (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-29-08 07:43 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. mmm... cookies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC