How come the DNC Convention didn't get such coverage? They were into Clinton/Obama disunity 24/7!

[FrenchieCat]

and had GOP operatives on with the biased for Corporate interest media for blabefest.

How can they discriminate and make it seem ok?

[featherman]

1. A fair and frustrating question. Does ANYBODY in the media even see this discrepancy?

[FrenchieCat]

4. They don't give a shit. We are barely human to them!

We're just a bunch of Vaginas, Blacks that don't count, Hispanics that need to be shipped back, the educated elite, and union folks.

[stolivodka]

2. bias? in my media??

Well, um, you see, what we refer to as "the media" is owned by corporations that are owned by Republicans. They got a bit pissed about the whole Watergate thing and decided to make sure that it never happened again.

[Borgnine]

3. Exactly!

Where the FUCK are the Democrats and left-leaning panelists? Even KO has been secluded from actively participating in the conversation.

[creeksneakers2]

5. Have they said anything about the Ron Paul people?

[Whisp]

6. very unbalanced coverage between the two, but I'm not surprised.

Even the sound for the crowd tonight is turned up volume wise compared to the Obama acceptance speech night which would have been a glorious cacophony to behold, but they made sure that wasn't to be shared with their viewers.


fuckers.

[jenmito]

7. I asked the same thing at about 8:20 when they started showing all their speeches with no

interruptions. The DNC speeches didn't even START being shown 'til 10pm and then didn't even show the speeches by Kerry, Richardson, etc.