Have they started a game changing move by silencing critics pointing out the obvious - that the emperor has no clothes, or empress in this case? Palin is shockingly bad, and if this were 1988 or 2000 she'd have been the focus of nightly news at this point with her refusal to answer intelligent questions about affairs since she only wants, possibly, the presidency? Who is she? Who knows, John McCain only met her one time before he picked his "soul mate" to be his VP choice. He's losing it! And I have noticed a lot more ridiculous stories like this one from politico
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080909/pl_politico/20934Notice how they leave out the part about these people not agreeing with her politics at all, but make a major news story about people being angry about people judging that a woman can't juggle kids and running for VP. Their comment about not agreeing with her is like 5 paragraphs in! I just want to put this question out and see if others who read news, quite possibly all day long, notice a change from a month ago?
It is nice to see MSNBC finally has the Palin expense reports story up finally.