Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"PALIN AND RAPE-KIT CHARGES...it turns out, the policy really was that bad."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:47 PM
Original message
"PALIN AND RAPE-KIT CHARGES...it turns out, the policy really was that bad."
PALIN AND RAPE-KIT CHARGES.... Reponding to the story about Sarah Palin charging rape victims for medical exams, Atrios noted today, "I actually haven't mentioned this story because there were a few details I wasn't quite sure about so I wasn't sure if it's as bad as it sounded."

I was thinking the exact same thing. There just had to be more to this, some exculpatory information that didn't make Palin sound awful. The Anchorage Daily News looked into the matter and, as it turns out, the policy really was that bad.

(Former Gov. Tony Knowles (D)) broke new ground while answering a reporter's question on whether Wasilla forced rape victims to pay for their own forensic tests when Palin was mayor. True, Knowles said.

Eight years ago, complaints about charging rape victims for medical exams in Wasilla prompted the Alaska Legislature to pass a bill -- signed into law by Knowles -- that banned the practice statewide.

"There was one town in Alaska that was charging victims for this, and that was Wasilla," Knowles said

A May 23, 2000, article in Wasilla's newspaper, The Frontiersman, noted that Alaska State Troopers and most municipal police agencies regularly pay for such exams, which cost between $300 and $1,200 apiece.

"(But) the Wasilla police department does charge the victims of sexual assault for the tests," the newspaper reported.

What's more, USA Today reported that the state sponsor of the legislation on rape kits wrote the bill with Wasilla in mind. It was that one small town, in other words, that necessitated statewide legislation to protect rape victims from this absurd fee.

A Palin spokesperson, contacted by USA Today, said the governor "does not believe, nor has she ever believed, that rape victims should have to pay for an evidence-gathering test."

That's good, but there's still the record to deal with. The town of Wasilla had rape victims to pay for their own medical exams during Palin's mayoral tenure, and Palin's hand-picked police chief publicly opposed the state law when it was passed in 2000.

Asked when Palin learned of the policy, and what Palin did to try to change the policy, her spokesperson chose not to respond.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. "her spokesperson chose not to respond"
Sounds promising.

Time to get this out there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ashy Larry Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. John McCain has a troubling history on this issue as well.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 06:12 PM by Ashy Larry
In 1994, John McCain voted against legislation -- pushed through Congress by Joe Biden -- that helped put an end to the practice of charging rape victims for sexual assault exams.

http://www.jedreport.com/2008/09/mccain-voted-against-biden-law.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:55 PM
Original message
Gee, her spokesperson chose not to respond. Sick!!
Oh, and why has 9/11 become Palin day on CNN and ABC. :grr: Crass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hmm. I'm starting to concoct a good debate question from this story...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. rapists have the right to chose the mother of their child
the taxpayers should not have to pay these costs :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Again, words fail.
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ebdarcy Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. They need to make an ad out of this.
They need to include both Palin's and McCain's positions on this issue. It needs to be an ad that lays it all bare. Maybe something that includes reported rape stats, and then mentions the estimated number of unreported rapes. And then the announcer says how many more would go unreported if you had to pay for the evidence gathering. And then pictures of little innocent girls with an announcer saying "would you want his for your daughter?" I want a tearjerker of an ad. I want people to be horrified. Fuck both McCain and Palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. north carolina charged until just recently
a totally appalling situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Alaska ranks #1 with rape against women. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wtf is wrong with this,,,,creature?
Yeah she is the who is going to advance women's rights :puke:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC