|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
AlphaCentauri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-23-08 11:12 PM Original message |
Ralph Nader, cranky and California-bound |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-23-08 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. Fuck him and the horse he rode |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlphaCentauri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-23-08 11:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Blaming everybody else is part of our culture or what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bitchkitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 12:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. The election was stolen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 01:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
13. That was impressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clixtox (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 01:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Sad, or hilarious for the cynical, post! Sniffing that oxymoron gas too much! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SILVER__FOX52 (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-23-08 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. I haven't forgiven him for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeFleur1 (973 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-23-08 11:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Nadar didn't steal Florida's votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. THANK YOU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 12:23 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Nader Was Working to Throw the Election to Bush**. He Made it Close Enough to Steal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 12:32 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. The Republican Party gave Nader a lot of money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #8 |
30. Exactly, thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patriotvoice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 04:34 AM Response to Reply #4 |
21. "Nadar" -- NADAR: NAder Detection And Ranging? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 08:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
23. He knew how critical every vote was and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlphaCentauri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 10:21 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. and Bush was re-elected 4 years ago, Naders fault again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Why did he have republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlphaCentauri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 07:40 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. that's how the system is setup, the other parties can get obscene amounts of money with out question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlphaCentauri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-23-08 11:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Gore gave up too soon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indenturedebtor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Sep-23-08 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
5. I know Barr and he seems like a fine upstanding individual. Who is this Nader guy again? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
9. if he did anything in between for people it might even be viable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 02:58 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. And you know that how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 08:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
24. I'd like to know that, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverojo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 01:01 AM Response to Original message |
12. Screw Nader! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
clixtox (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 01:57 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Nader is 100X more "viable", in every sense, than McLamebrain! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 02:26 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. " Nader would have exposed Bush as a not-so-facile tool, and an ignorant fool, in the 2000 debates" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
15. Fuck Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 03:00 AM Response to Original message |
19. I agree. They should be in the debates. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 04:45 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. I agree too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 03:21 AM Response to Original message |
20. Of course they should be heard. Excluding them sets a president for excluding any speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mark E. Smith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
25. Remember when Ralphie used to say there was no difference ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adenoid_Hynkel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-24-08 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
28. I'm voting Obama, but Ralph is right on the commission--it's a sham |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 01:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC