Call me fickle or terribly responsible--my own contemplation about Gephardt goes something like this.
War and peace are my overriding concerns, followed by economic justice. I'm a Kucinich supporter, committed since April, who still finds Gephardt very attractive. I've attended two of Gephardt's three visits here during this campaign. (Also saw him here in 1988 and elsewhere in between.) However, until I decided Dean was not the "antiwar candidate" he was cracked up to be, I thought Gephardt was my fourth choice behind Dean and Gephardt. Kerry is my Number 2 today, but that's not solid. I'll have a clearer sense of Dean's rank after breakfast with him tomorrow. Gephardt could become my Number 3 or even Number 2.
Fifty or 60 neighbors witnessed my exchange with him in October when I spoke in favor of Kucinich's Department of Peace proposal. He had been recounting about all the things he had been "telling" President Bush about Iraq (build a broad coalition, go to the UN and NATO, etc.), and he talked about being with Bush on 9/12/01. I said the president needs the voice of a Secretary of Peace at a time like that, and he responded warmly. He spoke of needing to invest in the "software" of peacemaking so that it can be called upon to expand the range of options in a moment when the standard voices are calling for war. He said there's a lot of merit in the DoP proposal.
One on one, he thanked me for my question and told me he really likes and values Dennis and is acquainted with Dennis's bill, H.R. 1673 (
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.01673: ). I said he should sign on as a co-sponsor. He said it's a good bill, and he would actually want to build on it, expand it. Then he turned to someone else. (Yeah, deft politician, I thought.) However, before he left, a staffer introduced himself and said the congressman REALLY appreciated my being there and the question I asked. (Yeah, sharp staffer, I thought.) But THEN, literally on his way out the door, Gephardt stopped and reached for my hand and thanked me for being there. Stepping close, I met his gaze and said, "Co-sponsor Dennis's bill." "I will," he said. Firm voice, firm gaze, firm grip of my hand.
Later that week I was with Kucinich and told him this story. He grinned and made big, round eyes. "He did? He said that?" That was his reaction. What to make of all this? Yeah, slick politicians, all of 'em...
Invest in "the software of peacemaking"? I love it! Do I want to encourage Dick Gephardt? Yes!
By the way, I asked Kerry about DoP and got back an answer like this: "With the right leadership in the White House, we would have a peace president who valued his secretary of state, so we wouldn't need another government bureaucracy." I countered with needing a peace plans as well as war plans at the cabinet table in crisis, etc. Like Gephardt, Kerry then thanked me for my question and presence. I'll see him here again next week.
As I was writing this, I stopped to take a call from a Gephardt canvasser and told her what I was writing and the inquiry I was answering. She said she believes "Mr. Gephardt" did all he could to slow the president's unilateral rush to war but did his duty and presented a united front when it was clear the president was going to war anyway. She said she thinks "we in the heartland" aren't as fearful as folks on the coasts, that "Mr. Gephardt" is one of us and understands us and also understood the limits of what he could do for peace when most of the American people wanted a war.
Anyway, yes, we think about Gephardt in Iowa!
(Larouche is nowhere on my list, but, if he were, Lieberman would place well ahead.)