|
...while there are certainly "concern trolls" who are way over the top, I do understand the general anxiety and where it comes from.
Where it comes from is that losing the 2000 and 2004 elections made so little sense. When you've twice in a row seen someone like Bush win (or "win" in scare quotes if you prefer) the election, and you can't imagine how such a seeming idiot (in 2000) and such a proven idiot (in 2004) could win, it's hard to feel secure in the belief that reason will prevail in 2008.
It's disheartening that the election is even close enough that we have to worry about it at all. As far as I'm concerned Obama should have been well ahead of McCain from day one and never, ever have dipped below McCain in the polls, if there were anything sensible and predictable about the American voting public.
Here's one thing that DU-ers and freepers alike seem to agree upon -- the results of this election are in the hands of idiots.
The voters who remain undecided in this election, who swish back and forth from week to week, even day to day, based on whatever shiny (or tarnished) objects the media and current events dangle before them, are not by-and-large intelligent voters with long lists of carefully thought out pros and cons for each candidate, lists that are in near-perfect balance and are thus swayed by small real changes in information or events. They are "low information" voters, being emotionally swung back and forth by personalities, trivia, rumor, unexamined talking points, etc.
Knowing whose hands this election is in, cautious optimism is the best I can muster for Obama's success. No, I don't go as far as the "concern trolls" jumping at every shadow and seeing conspiracies and traps behind every corner, but I'm certainly not in league with the insistent optimists either, who seem to believe that optimism in-and-of-itself is the way to win, getting angry at every non-optimist as if it's their lack of optimism itself is going to "jinx" the election.
|