Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Publisher says Kelley book legally airtight . . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:44 AM
Original message
Publisher says Kelley book legally airtight . . .
Peter Gethers, vice president of Random House and Kelley's editor, said the publisher's chief counsel and Kelley's own lawyer went over the book "with a fine-toothed comb."

"It was as extensive a legal read as a publisher could give," Gethers said. "Some things didn't make it, and we're 100 percent confident of the things that made it in. We erred on the side of caution because we knew how hard she was going to be hit."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A3665-2004Sep7?language=printer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
judge_smales Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Shoot!


I'd rather see law suits. It would give the charges far more play in the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Bring on the billboards with this book plastered on it... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Doesn't mean they won't sue. They just won't win. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. message to media - now run the damn thing ! you cowards and sellouts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. If you look at the test for punative damages in libel
Edited on Wed Sep-08-04 09:50 AM by amber dog democrat
" Reckless disregard for truth or falsity " before something is published, then
yes, I think that the publisher would have verified its facts.
( New York Times vs Sullivan )

We are NOT discussing Ann Coulter. I think it will be impossible to disprove the allegations. There is nothing they can do about it either.
Serves them right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. ELITE MEDIA
Borrow some cahones, and Run the damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem Agog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Unbelievable...
That the stuff that made it in has passed such legal scrutiny. Man, shrub is TOAST!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. I believe it
Kelley has always prided herself on her meticulous records and sources.

However.....

that doesn't mean her charges are true. It only means she hasn't broken the law by printing them. If she says "Sharon Bush told me George W. Bush snorted coke at Camp David", it doesn't have to be true that W snorted lines in a log cabin. It means Sharon told her he did.

That being said, I can't wait to read the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem Agog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Duplicate, sorry...
Edited on Wed Sep-08-04 09:56 AM by southpaw4kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. 2 for 1 according to your post count
and welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. Gee, that's too bad.
I mean, really. That's just a shame. }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC