Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Correctly Political: What if John Galt had a Special Needs Child?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jfxgillis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 03:53 PM
Original message
Correctly Political: What if John Galt had a Special Needs Child?
Money quote:

This is not, by the way, intended to argue that society should play even the slightest role in making the decision not to terminate. That is an area of intimate family conduct to which the state should have not the slightest claim. It is, however, to argue this: If Senator Obama is a Socialist, then so is Governor Palin. The difference is, his Socialism is the ordinary and banal sort ostensibly intended to support "poor people." Her Socialism supports "Those who hold to the doctrine that life begins at conception and that abortion is murder." Thus, the Special Needs children themselves are not the sole beneficiaries of socialized Special Education funding.


Correctly Political: What if John Galt had a Special Needs Child?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. He does.
His name is Alan Greenspan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very well-written
The bright side to the accusations of "socialism" hurled at us by the McCain camp is that they are so easily rebutted and exposed, and it's leading to a much-needed discussion of the role and the responsibility of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know. But please, God, let the freepers sulk off into the wilderness to "deprive" us...
Edited on Sun Nov-02-08 05:02 PM by Kristi1696
Of their "superior" intellect.

They'll have to pick a different state though, 'cause Colorado is now blue. ;)

ETA: Ironically, I think that Rand probably would have been a big proponent of aborting Downs children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
delete_bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-02-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ya think? Here's Rand on abortion....
"The question of abortion involves much more than the termination of a pregnancy: it is a question of the entire life of the parents. As I have said before, parenthood is an enormous responsibility; it is an impossible responsibility for young people who are ambitious and struggling, but poor; particularly if they are intelligent and conscientious enough not to abandon their child on a doorstep nor to surrender it to adoption. For such young people, pregnancy is a death sentence: parenthood would force them to give up their future, and condemn them to a life of hopeless drudgery, of slavery to a child’s physical and financial needs. The situation of an unwed mother, abandoned by her lover, is even worse."

--Ayn Rand

I'm glad you brought this up. I forget about her abortion stand at times when 'arguing' with Randian types. The issue of abortion was also behind her profound opposition to Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC