Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader Costs Obama from Winning Missouri

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:15 PM
Original message
Nader Costs Obama from Winning Missouri
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 05:15 PM by Avalon6
Obama lost by about 6,000 votes and Nader got 17,769 votes.

John McCain, Sarah Palin REP 1,442,613 49.4%
Barack Obama, Joe Biden DEM 1,436,745 49.2%
Ralph Nader, Matt Gonzalez IND 17,769 .6%

I'm not really angry since Obama won, just thought it was interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. At least half of those votes wouldn't go to anyone had they not went to Nader
Nader fans are pretty hardcore. They wouldn't vote Obama if he was the only one left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, but add .3% to Obama's total and he would've won.
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. not .15
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I believe it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think it was the racists in the south
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. What about the rural racists in southern Indiana? Didn't stop Obama from winning THAT state.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. I would want to see the numbers before I commented on that
Maybe Obama had a better ground game in IN. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. They didn't vote for Kerry, Gore or Clinton either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. There are racists everywhere.
The South's problem is that there is only right-wing media.

Outside of Atlanta and Memphis - which both voted Democratic - there is no alternative to the RushHannityBoortzSavageIngraham glut. Even our newspapers are conservative. People really don't get the information they need to make informed decisions.

I think that the Obama Administration (doesn't that sound great?) should "bully pulpit" for wealthier folks to buy up some stations and put some, at least moderately-left, talk on. That would work WONDERS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Very true about talk radio
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 07:19 PM by proud2Blib
They need to do something to put more of a balance in public affairs programming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. Excellent point. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. actually those voters might have stayed home if Nader wasn't on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrizzlyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. I guess Ralph will head back to his $1.5 million town house
With a small moral victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Damned democracy in action
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Can you believe it?
Disgusting, I'll say...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. yawn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nader has become such a sad joke ... I am pretty hard left and
I totally understand his position on issues ..


But what is this obsession with presidential races ...

I remember a cartoon where he is candidate for the tupperware party .. Its not far from reality. SAD !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. We need to give Nader his own television show.
That way, he won't need to "run for president" every time he wants some attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. He sort of does, already.
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 06:02 PM by Lilith Velkor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Okay, I'll say it. I hate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boudica the Lyoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. I've always hated Nader.
If he had his way there'd be a Republican in the White House for the rest of his life time. He knows he stands no chance of winning but he has a huge ego. He reminds me of someone who kills a celebrity just to have his name linked with theirs forever. Yep, he gave us Bush and he doesn't care. If it wasn't for Nader there wouldn't have been a Iraq war etc. I hate him. I hate the very sight of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subterranean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. On the other hand, Bob Barr may help Obama win North Carolina
Obama currently leads McCain in NC by just 13,000 votes. Bob Barr got about 25,000 votes, most of which probably would have gone to McCain, if anybody. So that would make up for the loss of MO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. well, bob barr helped us in NC, so maybe it balanced out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. Nader once did a lot for our country's people
but has just become a toxic asshole in his old age and needs to go to pasture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. No Nader didn't cost him Miss. the 17,769 voters did and 5 million egomaniacal, purist assholes
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 05:39 PM by rvablue
who voted for him in 2000 who brought us the Shrub for 8 fucking years.

Fuck Nader.
Fuck the Green Party.
And fuck those that voted for this closet Republican narcissist freak this year and in 2000.

And if you don't like my language, pardon me. If you check my posts I usually don't swear but this deserves it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happychatter Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. make sure if you can, that no more progressives feel welcome under the new administration
Edited on Wed Nov-05-08 05:44 PM by happychatter
that will help a lot

edited to add:

:sarcasm:

in case you've been drinking that knob noster ground water
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. that's illogical
people who wanted to vote for Obama voted for Obama, people who wanted to vote for Nader voted for Nader. It's not like people couldn't figure out the difference between McCain and Obama. Nader DOES have supporters across the country, even if they're less than 20,000 per state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. How do you know people who vote for Nader would have voted for Obama
maybe they would have stayed home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abugface Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. Nader is not a nice person (actually he's a aging spoiled brat), but ...
he didn't put a gun to anyone's head and tell them to vote for him or else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. Ahhh...a Nader thread on DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. That's democracy for ya.
Admission: I'd be pissed off if Obama lost the election on this. Now? Meh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gemlake Donating Member (535 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
30. My uncle voted for Nadar. Otherwise he's a straight ticket
Democrat. He also voted for Nadar in 2000 and 2004. I've explained to him repeatedly that Nadar is NOT a vote for progressive values, he is funded and pushed by Republicans as a way of defeating Democrats. He doesn't care. He likes Nadar. I think he believes his vote doesn't matter, so he can do what he wants.

I'm very disappointed that we lost Missouri. I truly believed up until late last night that we could pull it out, but it wasn't meant to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. Those votes don't belong to Obama
He has to go out and win them. Nader has a right to run. wtf?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Well, no
But if the people voting don't want McCain in office, their better bet was voting for Obama. I don't get what's so difficult about that. It's a two party system. Reality. I mean, if the voter doesn't care whether or not McCain wins, that's one thing. But, I, as a progressive who probably has more in common with the Greens, does. So I don't vote Green. I never will, until they stop being a spoiler party supported mainly by idiots who don't get how our election system works, and actually work effectively to change our country. It's that simple. Fortunately, 8 years of Bush knocked enough sense into enough heads. Thank God is all I have to say. Look, it really is a shame we have this crappy, two party system. No one hates it more than I do. But as long as we have it, spoiling the elections won't change a damn thing, even if we have the right to do so. Just because someone has the right to do something doesn't mean they deserve a pat on the back for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Progressive?
There is no substantial progress until progressives quit subscribing to the point of view that you just articulated. As long as some folks see it your way, we will always be stuck with this broken two party system.

Please tell me you see how your point of view acts to keep the two party system running.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
32. I am a Missourian..Nader didn't cause him to lose
Ignorance in my state made him lose.
People still wrongly believe thst he is a muslim and his wife hates america and yada yada yada.
They will come out of it by the next election cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
33. I thank him
Now they'll stop claiming MO predicts the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-05-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
34. You know, we wasted over 4 years going after Greens instead of properly attacking Republicans.
Let's not do it again, especially when the Greens cost us something very inconsequential this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC