|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
SoonerPride (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:33 AM Original message |
For the first time in 28 years, there will be no Bush or Clinton in the executive branch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blu Dahlia (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
1. or Dole :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoonerPride (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:37 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Glad to see the Dole name banished as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipfilter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
3. I was 8 in 1979 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. OMG! I have shoes older than that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kennetha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
4. But Hillary Clinton will be a major player in the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 11:21 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Yeah, that's what I was thinking. When did the U.S. senator from New York become a powerless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoonerPride (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 11:57 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. I was just talking about the Executive Branch, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. And who knows, Chelsea may follow in her parents' footsteps. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
5. My life and pocketbook were both fabulous during the Clinton years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoonerPride (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
6. Glad to be rid of Bush, and glad the Clinton's will be around for a long time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoyGBiv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
7. Bush is the key there ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
9. or a Reagan, Nixon, Eisenhower, Roosevelt, Taft, Adams, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southpaw (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
10. I would have supported Hillary had she won the primaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
11. The Clintons' where great but I've known nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
12. Yeah, but no one can predict the future. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
14. Caught in the middle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richardo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
15. For the first time since 1952, no Bush or Dole in federal gov't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhollyHeretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
16. Wait. I thought the vice president was in charge of the senate, not in the executive branch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
17. Has Senator Clinton been ruled out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
19. Finally! A breath of fresh air. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
politicasista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC