Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama won't raise taxes on wealthy until 2011 ... link

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:47 AM
Original message
Obama won't raise taxes on wealthy until 2011 ... link
I was waiting to see whether Obama would raise taxes on the wealthy right away or wait for the Bush tax cuts to expire at the end of 2010. This article states that the latter is the option he has chosen. Waiting to repeal the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy is probably the smart thing to do politically in a recession - if he raised their taxes right away then anything bad economically that happened afterwards would be spun by the Repukes as a vindication of supply-side economics.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/11/08/2008-11-08_obama_says_hell_tax_the_rich_roll_back_b.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Important talking point to remember: the over $200,000 crowd voted 52% for Obama
Not that their special "permission" is needed, but he has a mandate to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree concentrating on a number of things first before ..
raising taxes is a wise move. I think his approach to get people working first is probably the best, people making more money are more apt to accept a tax hike. Once the MC see he isn't taking their money, those over 250k can't complain about the small hike they will have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know. The reversal of the tax breaks for the wealthy and new tax
breaks for the middle class are pretty much the meat and bones of his election campaign promises. If he starts waffling on shit like this then there will be a lot of 'buyer's remores' amongs indies and cross-over repubs. He can't afford to dilly-dally on this one.

But I'm willing to wait and see what he says to my face. When it comes out of his mouth, then I'll start to worry.

I never saw this guy as a liberal anyway. If he taks a conservative turn on us, I won't be surprised. Campaigns are one thing, reality is another. I'm just gonna wait until he actually does something to freak out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Issue #1 is the economy, and doing WHATEVER is needed to get it on track. Shit like delaying tax
increases for the wealthiest Americans won't hurt him AT ALL if it means getting the economy working again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Phooey. We need the money from those fucks. Do you think they're gonna
pony up on their own? Have they done it so far? Are you still a believer in trickle down economics?

No, the wealthiest need to start paying their way. And the middle and lower classes need some cash in their pockets. And the tax cuts are at the heart of this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Notice I didn't mention tax CUTS. Going back on a promise of tax cuts is potentially harmful. I simp
ly took issue with your assumption that Obama going back on a promise to INCREASE taxes on a demographic that voted for him (I believe it was a 52/48 split) will hurt him.


It won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Tax increases, tax cuts. The siamese twins of our ecomony. You can't
Edited on Sun Nov-09-08 12:33 PM by acmavm
have a cut without an increase somewhere.

edit: to add unless you want more of what we got now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grey Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. I saw a 5 second sound bite that
with Obama saying first we must close some loopholes.
It was on CBC News and I have no link. Sounds good to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. excellent decision in this economic climate n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Two Americas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. right
We don't want to get the Republicans mad at us. It is not as though the public had utterly rejected them or anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Stupid move on his part
The beginning of his administration, when he's got the momentum, mandate and popularity on his side is the best time to push through these sorts of measures. Not to mention the fact that politically it is better to get these sorts of things done early in administration rather than closer to the election, when it they are closer to the surface of the public's memory.

Do it, get it done now. We need the money and can't afford to wait for another two years. All that this delay will do is rack up the debt some more without a concurrent rise in government income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. WTF? His mandate was to tax the crap out of the stinking
rich and spread the wealth. Let's go here!

Huge tax increases are good for the economy, didn't Bushco's tax cuts for the rich cause all these problems?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prodigalone Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. We need to tone down our rhetoric against the rich
Wealthy citizens are instrumental to the nation's economy. They too have right to benefit from an Obama administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Ahhhh...I'm sure...welcome to DU..lmao
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Raising taxes in a recession is a bad idea
I think Obama is making the right move to go ahead with the middle-class tax cuts and wait until the economy is on firmer footing to raise taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Here you are with yet another screen name.
I've done my civic DUty...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's the smart move. He wants to get a tax cut passed that will help the middle class.
Raising taxes during a decline is not sound policy.

He's doing the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheManagement Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. politically expedient and economically sound.
Possibly raise the top two brackets by 1/2 of what he originally planned in 2010 and then the full amount in 2011.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. And so it begins.
No, he won't raise taxes in this term, maybe next term, but then he won't do it then either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC