Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill vetting could cost Hillary her Cabinet post

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:41 PM
Original message
Bill vetting could cost Hillary her Cabinet post
Politico: Bill vetting could cost Hillary her Cabinet post
By GLENN THRUSH & MIKE ALLEN | 11/17/08

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) is President-elect Obama’s first choice for secretary of State but his aides are becoming exasperated by the Clinton camp’s pokey response to demands for extensive information about former President Bill Clinton’s finances, according to numerous Democrats involved in the process. “The sense among the no-drama Obama world is: This is well on its way to winning best Oscar for drama,” said one well-connected Democratic official.

There are signs, however, that the Clintons may move decisively to satisfy the vetting requests in coming days, clearing the way for a “Team of Rivals” cabinet that would bring the president-elect’s opponent for the Democratic nomination into his historic administration.

Democratic officials make it sound like the job has been all but offered to her. But the ball is in her court to show that the former president’s many foreign and financial entanglements would not pose huge conflicts of interest if she were the nation’s chief diplomat, the officials said. Obama isn’t likely to formally offer the post to Clinton unless he’s given assurances Bill Clinton’s global charitable foundation won’t create future conflicts of interest with foreign governments, according to a person familiar with the situation.

The Clinton Global Initiative has earned widespread plaudits for its efforts to eradicate AIDS, malaria and poverty in Africa. But it could prove problematic for Obama if the former president continues to seek donations from foreign countries – at the same time his wife is asking them for diplomatic concessions as Secretary of State. The Clinton Global initiative, which has raised more than $30 billion since 2005, has solicited major donations from a handful of foreign governments, including a $1 billion pledge from Norway in 2007....

"I doubt that they are looking for an excuse to pick someone else,” a neutral Democratic official said, “but rather are genuinely concerned that Bill Clinton’s work, while worthy, would be greatly complicating if she were SecState."...

***

The former president was in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, and Kuwait City, Kuwait, over the past four days and returned to the United States on Monday morning. Friends outside government said it seems reasonable for a couple to want to talk about a life decision over the kitchen table rather than over a crackly cell connection 10 time zones away. In Kuwait, the former president sure sounded like a man who wanted the job for his wife, so he might be expected to do what is necessary for her to earn Obama’s nod....

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15680.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. good. Now maybe someone with bona fide foreign policy cred like Bill Richardson can get the job n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I do too. We need people who actually have had positions within the international relations realm
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 12:50 PM by political_Dem
to be considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I assume Richardson needs to be vetted too. He has "issues."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. no one can have more baggage than a Clinton. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. What about GHWB or his son?
Who are fortunately not on any short list? There are many people who's baggage is completely or at least substantially unknown to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Exactly - any one needs to be vetted
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 01:38 PM by karynnj
The 2 most significant that I have heard on Richardson was that he completely mishandled the Wen Ho Lee case, leaking his name to the media. It is disturbing to me that this scientist was mistreated this way possibly because he was Chinese. He also seems to have he should not be allowed anywhere near any environmental treaty after his advocacy of piping Great Lakes water to the dry west.

There is no one that is above vetting or perceived so clean that vetting is not needed - even Gore and Kerry - who the Republicans failed to find anything on.

I hope they consider some career diplomats - especially as Biden will play a role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. yup, everyone gets vetted. live with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. What is wrong with you? I've said in every single thread that Hillary and Bill should be vetted just
as any other candidate for SOS would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. so why are you asking the question then?
people are vetted irregardless of perceived "issues" ahead of time. whether you think Richardson has issues or others think Hillary does never changes the fact that all cabinet posts are vetted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Or Wes Clark - who has oodles more than Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I sincerely doubt that Obama would have made the offer without covering the bases. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmic Charlie Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. that's just it, he didn't make any offer. he asked if she was willing to be vetted.
but that didn't stop 'leaks' from assuring everyone it was a done deal.

then we find that Bill Richardson was interviewed after this 'done deal'.
then we find that the Clintons haven't even agreed to be vetted.
then we realize the initial 'leak' was bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Amazing how they can write so much...yet say so little...
An entire article based on nothing new...

The 24 hour news cycle I guess...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why does it always have to come down to Bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Because Bill is not a neat package.
And he may well cost Hillary this SoS position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Trick Is How To Do An Ethical Wall. Think of Buffet As Treasury Sec
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 12:51 PM by Median Democrat
Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State creates severe conflict of interest issues with Bill Clinton's global initiative, since Bill's group is essentially freelancing albeit for good causes. The upside is that the Global Initiative and Bill Clinton's connections give Hillary tremendous advantages as a SoS. The downside is that it also poses significiant conflict issues.

This is part of the reason why Warren Buffet as Secretary of State was a non-starter. Buffet simply could not divest himself of Berkshire Hathaway. With Bill, this should not be a problem, since it is a non-profit, and Bill does not "own" the Clinton Global initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
17. NOTE: THIS DELAY AND ACRIMONY ARE BEING DENIED BY TRANSITION SOURCES. SEE THIS...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
19. What cabinet post? I haven't heard an 'official' announcement of any kind from Obama's team.
Everything that the media's reporting and clogging up this board is nothing more than speculation.

It's insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC