Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A "leak" some here won't like...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:35 PM
Original message
A "leak" some here won't like...
"Unraveling The Mystery Of Clinton's Secret Chicago Trip"


People close to the Obama transition say they understand all this -- they understood all this last week --- and that there's been no delaying, there's been no acrimony, and that Clinton and her team have acted professionally and appropriately.


http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/11/on_wednesday_the_call_came.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. as expected. The media wants drama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Some of that around here too...
Sad to say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. if your trying to fling feces, just put it down and back away.
Starting a flame bait like this will get you banned lightning fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Stating fact is not flinging feces...
A cursory glance at the front page of GD: Presidential is evidence of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Not so fast...
Can we get a general consensus on whether stating fact is appropriate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. You must have missed all the shit that's been flung by the I HATE HILLARY
crowd.

Or is that 'different'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. same thing really
so lets perpetuate it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. You must have missed all the shit that's been flung by the I HATE HILLARY
crowd.

Or is that 'different'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. you must have missed the part about hitting the button once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmic Charlie Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. believe you me, most of us would be overjoyed if this episode had never even occurred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. why won't some here like it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rumors and speculation from Marc Ambinder? Here's more
So -- what's responsible for the radio silence between Thursday and today?

A few things:

Sources close to the process have said that Obama and Clinton discussed a variety of possible roles she could play in a new administration, including Secretary of State.

If Clinton is offered a cabinet spot and decides to accept it, it's not unreasonable to expect her to want to think about her options and spend time discussing the offer with her close friends and advisers.

As it happens, three of her top advisers -- former campaign manager Maggie Williams, chief legal adviser Cheryl Mills, and President Clinton -- were out of the country late last week.

Mills, who was Abu Dhabi, has always played a central role on any matters related to the Clinton's joint finances or the presidents' foundation work. Any vet of Clinton's finances would run through Mills.

Bill and Hillary would be called upon to make decisions about transparency together, and since the former president was in Europe and Kuwait through Sunday, it's not unreasonable to expect Hillary Clinton to want to cogitate with her husband in person.

(emphasis added)

Sounds like he believes the leak came from a Clinton ally.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Doesn't say that at all...
In fact it implies otherwise...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. So what does it say?
Bill said he spoke to Hillary. He said she would make a great SoS, but that they didn't discuss it.

What this says is that there are a bunch of contradictory reports: she was offered the job, hasn't spoken to anyone, others are being considered, Bill is being vetted before Hillary has even spoken to anyone or indicated her willingness to submit to the vetting process, and more confusion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Oh, forgot this part
According to Democratic sources, Clinton disclosed the information to only three people and swore them to secrecy.


Wonder who told those Democratic sources?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanderBeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why wouldn't we like it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks for posting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Rather PERVERSE to call an official report a "leak."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. huh?...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. and then there's this:
from ClarkUSA's post here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=7881371&mesg_id=7881371

Team Obama, after all but offering SecState to Senator Clinton, is expressing EXASPERATION with the Clinton camp for the difficulty in getting a clean vet on President Bill Clinton’s many entanglements. “The ball is very much in her court, but the president's finances have been a major point of sensitivity from day one,” a Democratic official said. (“Day One!”)

“Given that everyone's mystified by how deliberately public the Clintons have made this once secret process, the assumption is either that the Clintons are trying to use the public buzz to steamroll their way in, create a sense of inevitability that overcomes those concerns, or that it's just a matter of time before they … satisfy vetting somehow, some way.

Otherwise, after all this speculation, there’ll be a permanent dark cloud hanging over her finances. … But generally the sense among the no-drama Obama world is: This is well on its way to winning best Oscar for drama.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. how is this stirring up trouble? its setting the record straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mollymongold Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. politico is obsessed with playing up clinton vs obama drama, no matter whats true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. Hallelujah, a word of reason in a forest of innuendo.
Thank you for posting, it won't mean beans to the usual rabid mob, but thanks anyway.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. I never expected anything less from Hill and Bill than full cooperation.
I said weeks ago, months ago - when the deal was made, both sides would honor it. They're professional politicians, and when you make a deal during the run up to the election with another politician, you do not breach that promise, or your word will never be trusted.

There IS honor among politicians when they shake on a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
28. So they're acting like adults. And?
This doesn't confirm your fervent hope that she'll get SOS. It just says there's no acrimony.

Obama doesn't do acrimony, so it's not like this is news. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
29. Nonsense, Obama's people are not talking- Clinton's are.
No one will ever convince me that this isn't a Clinton media orchestrated blitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC