|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
begin_within
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:00 AM Original message |
Anyone else think Hillary still has her eye on the presidency? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
1. Right now I honestly don't care either way.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
2. Of course she doesn't -- she's a team player |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zombie2
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
3. I bet she's thinking.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. ENOUGH!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. wahhhHHH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
5. Yes, let's change the subject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
6. 2016 is possible. If anyone is implying 2012, they need to up their dosage. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
7. I think she has her eye on being a great SoS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
9. I don't think so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
10. ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
11. It doesn't matter. Susan Rice will be the utterly perfect candidate in 2016. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
12. No, not at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue_onyx
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #12 |
24. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Your read and my read on the issue are pretty much identical. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maven
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
13. NO JUST YOU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vanderBeth
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
14. She doesn't have a chance anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
15. Also, your ignorance of Civics is showing through -- just give it a REST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
16. I'll let you know in 2016. Right now, let's think 2008 and 2009, and remain in reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
17. Isn't SOS somewhere in the line of ascension to POTUS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MyNameGoesHere
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
72. I don't know ask Al Haig. He didn't know either. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #17 |
85. It's the Line of Succession, and yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
88. 4th or 5th i think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeeHopeWin
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
18. Please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
19. Bet on Hillary 2016. SoS is a huge resume filler and will erase memories of Snipergate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
20. Is the pope catholic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
21. If she does a great job as SOS, she should go for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shiver
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
22. She has said she doesn't think she's going to run again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alter Ego
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
23. No, cause she'll be 70-something by 2016. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
64. No, She'll be 67/68. Same age as Al Gore. They both could run in 2016. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SheilaT
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
25. And like in the next eight years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoesTo11
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
26. In 2016, it will be 24 years since she became first lady. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AJH032
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Hillary was younger though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Except that a major portion of Obama's administration are from the Clinton years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
faithfulcitizen
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
30. absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
31. Welcome to the land of ignore- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
32. I don't think so - she'll be 8 years older |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. I agree that her presidential aspirations are over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
34. Well duh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
35. No. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
36. Deleted message |
Metric System
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Still role-playing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. He's got the role down pat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Ugh, you again? I'm hardly surprised to see the two of you continuing to engage in divisive behavior |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. You're the one who's all upset. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. We need to stand together against the Hillhate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:27 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. GIVE IT A REST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:29 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. I AGREE!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #55 |
63. Deleted message |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. just the bridge to tomorrow buddy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. role D20 save vs slime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. Head of State = POTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. The poster knows that -- they have an agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:24 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. Ah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. That's because you're off melon balling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:27 PM Response to Reply #50 |
53. Melon balling killed my brain cells. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. It also makes you go blind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. It also makes you go blind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:31 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. I keep LensCrafters in bidness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. You are such a Pev |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:27 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. No suprise, this is like the new freeperville when it comes to Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #50 |
67. Clearly they've gotten over the primaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:24 PM Response to Reply #43 |
49. Deleted message |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:40 PM Response to Reply #36 |
60. The satire was funny for a bit. Time to let it go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. critics!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. It's always the usual suspects. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
40. Eh, don't care. Hopefully someone newish will appear on the scene by then, anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
41. I'll worry about it in 2014. Until then, give it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
45. Meh... who cares any more? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepModem Mom
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
52. Every politician with a pulse has an eye on the Presidency. It's the business of politics -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
62. Maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
65. I would think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
69. Does the Pope wear Prada? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
70. I sure hope she does!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #70 |
75. that would be truly historic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #75 |
77. We missed it by a hair, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happychatter
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
71. I dunno. What do YOU think about when you masturbate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. Hillary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happychatter
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. mk u been steadily cracking me up for days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. TMI people, TMI!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #74 |
81. Duff? Swank? Sir Edmund? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PresidentObama
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
73. If she does, she has my support 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
79. Oh without a doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
80. I am hoping she's thinking about running for Governor of NY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
82. I agree. If Joe Biden decides to run, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 03:21 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. Biden won't run in 2016, he'll be 73 by then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chorophyll
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
84. Why shouldn't she? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 03:34 PM Response to Reply #84 |
86. Maybe because her top priority right now should be SoS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chorophyll
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. Fine. Of course, you might want to take that up with the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace frog
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
87. Sure, why shouldn't she run in 2016 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
90. So what if she does? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Splinter Cell
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
91. Is she breathing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RFKHumphreyObama
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
92. I think she's undecided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC