|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:42 AM Original message |
Pray for me. Pray for Arizona. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, I have been thinking of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roguevalley
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 01:00 AM Response to Reply #1 |
61. Could be worse. You could have had Sarah Palin. :) Hang in there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
2. You think she should have refused? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. No - of course not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. Yes. It was cold calculating and political. We were used. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. She's an excellent choice for Homeland Security. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Yes, how dare she accept an offer to serve our country!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Saracat has tried. She is very involved in Az politics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TuxedoKat
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. So sorry Pirhana! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. That's great. And if she is, then she should understand why the governor took that job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #27 |
37. Better leadership. That state party screwed the pooch. They had the money and the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
3. The Democrats in Indiana turned the state around. Let us know how to help. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. I will take you up on that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prolesunited
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
36. Umm, Indiana *re-elected* a Republican governor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. At the same time they gave their electoral votes to Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GrantDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 06:19 PM Response to Reply #36 |
70. And expanded the Democratic majority in the State House... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
4. When does the governorship come up for election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. 2010. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
7. Unintended consequences. That is really scary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
8. Democrats in Wisconsin have take their state back, finally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
9. I will keep you in my thoughts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Janet won re-election in 2006 by 15%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Best of luck! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ben_meyers
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. McCain is almost as hated by the wingers in Arizona |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. I was shocked that Sheriff Joe won by as much as he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
11. I'm very sorry to hear that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndrewP
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
12. I don't pray, but you have my best thoughts in dealing with those vile pigs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vanderBeth
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
14. Good Luck! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
16. That truly sucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
17. I am pissed that she is abandoning us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. jon - we have got to hold Brewer's feet to the fire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
39. I am in as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 08:53 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Yes we do, but we have no candidates for state chair! Except the incumbant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 09:11 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. We have nobody - do we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 09:18 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. Terry is going to run and is already gearing up. I thought Rae won? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:23 PM Response to Reply #47 |
56. Rae lost by 2 %. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amb123
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:44 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Actually Rae Waters did win her House race. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:53 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. omg - that is fantastic news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 01:46 AM Response to Reply #56 |
63. One seat. Anne Kirkpatrick.The rest were incumbents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiva
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
19. Ouch! Sorry about that...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. Great cartoon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Jan Brewer was Sec of State. It's sucksession. She was next in line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
28. To be fair leaving it all to Napolitano might of been a tiny bit unfair. But sounds a good plan to> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
29. I know you have some committed Democrats out there ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AspenRose
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
30. Hopefully some folks from surrounding blue states can help out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
31. Talking with an Arizona pollster earlier in the year they said that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. I was thinking that too. It's kinda like Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. It had very little to do with Mccain and everything to do with the RW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
32. Don't cry for me Ar-i-ZO-naaaaaa! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
42. He didn't TAKE her ... he simply gave her a nicer chair .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DesertRat
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
43. I'm just sick about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
political_Dem
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
44. I'm extremely saddened by this news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
46. Can you do a recall? Can you petition for a special election? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
48. Rachel Maddow just offered her apologies to Arizona. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 10:03 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Maybe Arizona needs to see what the far right has to offer in order to reject it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 10:20 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Excuse me? We have already seen what the far right has had to offer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #51 |
66. I know political history very well. Arizona was considered by Harry Truman to be his best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onetwo
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
49. Let me talk you down... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 10:21 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. You have no idea what these folks are like and the damage they will do in two years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 05:31 AM Response to Reply #52 |
65. One thing that may happen, is that with the housing crunch you (and we) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:10 PM Response to Reply #49 |
54. It's just that the person who will replace her is as bad as it gets. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ribrepin
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
53. Aw Pirhana |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:13 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Hey you - it's good to see you :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ribrepin
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 03:22 AM Response to Reply #55 |
64. Yeah, who knew it would be Obama/Biden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
57. Jsn Brewer?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Mon Dec-01-08 11:55 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Yep - that's the one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
62. I'm so sorry. I hope you guys manage to turn it around, somehow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
67. Wowza - looks like you got a Palin mini-me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demo dutch
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
68. How terrible... Why is she leaving AZ behind if she know how bad it will be! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 08:11 PM Response to Reply #68 |
72. How could she refuse Obama? But at the same time, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatSeg
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
69. Saw the subject line and KNEW it was you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atimetocome
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 06:21 PM Response to Original message |
71. LUV your comic in the OP. Sorry to hear that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tbyg52
![]() |
Tue Dec-02-08 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
73. I am so sorry. Best hopes and wishes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC