Freakers "Master Plan": File suit everytime Obama issues order

[maxrandb]

My God! The "frickin" Birth Certificate wingnuts are really getting their panties in a knot. Good thing they oppose "frivilous" lawsuits.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2138617/posts

By Bob Unruh © 2008 WorldNetDaily

A lawyer who is playing a key role in a California lawsuit urging officials to prevent the state's 55 Electoral College votes from being recorded for Barack Obama until questions about his citizenship are resolved says he's organizing plans to challenge, even after the inauguration, every order, every proposal, every piece of paperwork generated by Obama.

"We will file lawsuits on his actions, every time. As long as we have money, we will keep filing lawsuits until we get a decision as to his citizenship status," Gary Kreep, chief of the United States Justice Foundation, told WND today.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't there some law against abusing the judicial process??

[TheCowsCameHome]

1. They are truly a bunch of losers

.........right to the bitter end.

[Danger Mouse]

2. Heh, his name is appropriate. A Kreep, indeed.

[GodlessBiker]

3. Courts have prohibited individuals from filing more lawsuits without court permission...

if they file too many frivolous lawsuits.

[liberalhistorian]

13. Yes, indeed, it's called

being a "vexatious litigator" and while courts are generally understandably cautious, reserved and careful when it comes to ruling someone or group to be a "vexatious litigator", there are certain criteria and circumstances under which they almost always will do so, to protect the integrity of the court and the judicial system and to prevent its abuse and the deleterious effect on innocent defendants.

I would think that, if this "kreep" does, indeed, make good on their plans, that he and his group will be named a vexatious litigator after a certain number of suits are filed.

[ellenfl]

4. good! let the repugs bankrupt themselves. that oughta keep them

out of office for a while. :freak:

ellen fl :evilgrin:

[InternalDialogue]

5. Meanwhile, other lawyers are lining up at the door.

Not because they believe in the validity of any claim, but the vow "As long as we have money, we will keep filing lawsuits" is like a coyote call across the legal prairie.

Spend that money, freepers. Spend like the wind.

[awoke_in_2003]

6. Don't denegrate coyotes...

lawyers are more akin to jackels :)

[liberalhistorian]

14. I'm sorry, but that's bullshit.

I've been in the legal field for fifteen years and I've met very few attorneys like that. In fact, most of the ones I've known, worked for, and the one I'm married to, have never made that much money and have been more interested in helping people who need it than making money. I'm really sick of that bullshit stereotype.

I'll tell you what-doctors fit that stereotype far more than attorneys do. I've known attorneys who've been owed thousands of dollars but who've continued to provide services for that client when needed because it was needed, without going after the client for the money. Just try getting a doctor to do that, hell, you owe one a hundred bucks and they not only refuse to treat you until you cough it up no matter how serious your issue, they'll send it to their pit bull collectors. Been there, done that, with my parents and my stepdad's illness and others as well.

[awoke_in_2003]

15. It's called humor...

give it a try sometime.

[treestar]

26. What's your profession or job?

We'll make jokes about it so you can demonstrate your great sense of humor.

[awoke_in_2003]

29. No problem...

I supervise a flight simulation maintenance department, so go right ahead. I am also a male of English/Scotch/German descent, so you can fire away there, too. Don't take yourself so seriously. I work with pilot's all day long, and they are considered, by some, to be the biggest pricks in the world. But some of the best pilot jokes I have heard have been told to me by pilots.

On edit: added my gender so you can make some male jokes, too. I will probably chuckle about what you post, I do not take myself very seriously. I am (just like everybody else) just a small speck against the scale of the universe.

[maxrandb]

7. What a great analogy you just made

Don't know if you meant to, but when I read your post, I saw Barack Obama as the Roadrunner and the Freakers as Wylie Coyote opening a package marked "Law Degree" from "A.C.M.E University"

:rofl:

[Historic NY]

8. He just needs to say its Executive Privilege thats what * did.

[Puzzler]

9. Harvard = "Diploma Mill"

I was glancing at another Freeper-style forum very recently (I can't remember where)... and one of the members was ranting on about Obama's "diploma mill" diploma.

Seriously, these guys are just making stuff up as they go along.

[rug]

10. It's barratry.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barratry

In Califoornia it carries a six month sentence.

[InternalDialogue]

21. I just learned something.

Thanks!

[ikojo]

11. They did the same thing regarding

the Clinton's and the failed Arkansas land deal known as Whitewater. The right wing worked that to impeachment.

[kestrel91316]

12. Eventually people like this get declared vexatious litigants.

[Ilsa]

16. And that's when you smack them because no one will bother listening to them again. nt

[PatGund]

24. One of the people in the lawsuit parade....

IS a vexatious litigant (anti-semite Andy Martin has been declared such in a couple states)

[LynneSin]

17. Is this the best they can do against Obama. Hell we had a legitimate complaint in 2000

these people are a joke.

[Hepburn]

18. Hmmmmmm....I see vexatious litigant in someone's future! n/t

[marshall]

19. I can't wait for Pres. Obama to produce the original document

and shove it in their faces. That will put an end to this ridiculous fiasco.

[PatGund]

20. He has.....

....and the cultists always find yet another reason to claim it's invalid.

[marshall]

22. That's why the original document will shut them up

An original 1961 era document will leave them with nothing to harp about.

[PatGund]

23. Nope......

They'll either say it's forgery unless it says Kenya, or else they'll claim it's meaningless because Obama lost his US citizenship when his mom married Lolo Soetoro.

There is no level of proof they'll accept

[bridgit]

25. That's the same 'plan' they tied Clinton's hands with, definitely no change there...

[Life Long Dem]

27. It's just a piece of paper.

[Undercurrent]

28. Gary Kreep. HaHa

I knew I'd heard that name before.

--

Gary Kreep is the president and executive director of United States Justice Foundation.

According to his USJF biography, Kreep <1>

* Co-founded the United States Justice Foundation (USJF) in 1979 with two other California attorneys.
* Co-founded the Justice Political Action Committee (JPAC) in 1985 with two other conservative activists and has served as President of JPAC since then. JPAC is a federal political action committee registered with the Federal Election Commission.
* Co-founded the California Justice Political Action Committee (CALJPAC) in 1996 with two other conservative activists and has served as President of CALJPAC since then. CALJPAC is a California political action committee registered with the California FPPC.
* Co-founded the Family Values Coalition in 1998 with two other conservative activists and has served as President of FVC since then. FVC is a non-profit California corporation organized under IRC § 501c4.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Special:Remotereg&returnto=Gary_Kreep

--

Posts on Gary Kreep
CPAC: Judiciary Activists Attack 'Undermedicated, Psychotic Lefties'
By Ezra | March 2, 2007 - 6:10pm

While yesterday’s segment at CPAC devoted to judicial nominees – featuring Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania), who can count few fans at the event – was sparsely attended, even fewer showed up for today’s panel discussion on “judicial activism” instead of joining the crowds for Mike Huckabee and Wayne LaPierre of the NRA down the hall. Still, Jan LaRue of Concerned Women for America, Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch, and a man named Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation did their best to keep the attention of the handful of conference-goers on the subject that was one of the most vigorously touted at last year’s CPAC.

The enemies remained the same: judges who “legislate from the bench” and believe in a “living Constitution” which they “write … at will,” and senators who opposed some of Bush’s extreme nominations or who participated in the “Gang of 14” deal that halted the march toward the “nuclear option,” which would have forced through a rule change eliminating filibusters on those nominations. Fitton said of the filibustered nominees that “liberals thought they were too conservative, and yes, too Christian.” LaRue described as “undermedicated” and “psychotic” Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, along with groups like People For the American Way that opposed confirmation of John Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court.

The judicial heroes were also familiar: Roberts and Alito, whose successful appointment LaRue called the “biggest grassroots victory” in years; Justice Clarence Thomas, whom Fitton described as a model for “humble judges” who “restrain themselves.” In addition, Kreep singled out Janice Rogers Brown, perhaps the most radical of Bush’s appellate nominees, for her success in getting on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. According to Kreep, Brown was targeted because of her race by the Democratic Party, “one of the most racist” groups in country, which he said opposes any minority who doesn’t “kiss their tuckuses” and “say ‘yessa massa.’”
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/category/individuals/gary-kreep