Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We need to reframe gay marriage laws by eventually getting the Mutual Respect Act amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 12:35 AM
Original message
We need to reframe gay marriage laws by eventually getting the Mutual Respect Act amendment
Edited on Wed Dec-03-08 12:38 AM by zulchzulu
I was watching the fantastic original documentary "The Times of Harvey Milk" (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088275/) and it kept hitting me what we should retool for to make sure that gay marriage laws are finally accepted into society.

In my opinion, once any legislation has the term "marriage" in it, it sends out the usual evangelical thugs and their homophobic admirers to fund and fight against it. As is done in good advertising, good branding is essential for success... Of course, all the rights of marriage as well as the legal benefits of domestic partnerships and civil unions need to be built into this legislation. It needs to be simpler and less "excitable".

What struck me about some of the speeches and quotes Harvey Milk made in the documentary was a common thread of the words "mutual respect". He knew there would always be people against his personal sexual lifestyle and just asked that they at least know he would always be who he was and that they just need to show some respect.

Not only would a constitutional amendment called the Mutual Respect Act be exactly what it's all about and what is needed, but those two main words could be referenced to Harvey Milk, a man who essentially is a martyr for his cause.

So can we start petitioning Barack Obama and everyone else towards legislation called the Mutual Respect Act? I'm considering spending time to make it so.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Equal Rights Amendment would be better. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I thought about that as well... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yup. That is exactly correct. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't think this would work and here is why
I wrote a thread about the Prop 8 propaganda that sank like an anchor because it didn't scapegoat any particular group of people.
The commercials were blatantly designed to instill fear into people about legalizing gay marriage that goes straight for the live and let live argument.

It's clear that the majority of Californians had no problem with gay marriage so long as they did not have to hear about it or see it in any way whatsoever. But for some strange reason they have a problem with it if it means that society accepts homosexuality. And while there is no direct correlation between The King and King being read to school-children and gay marriage being legalized, as the propaganda falsely claims, there is a correlation between the legalization of gay marriage and the acceptance of homosexuality in society.

While the right wingers are hated filled bigots they are right and we are wrong when we say that gay marriage has no effect on them. It does have an effect of them. It affects them because it becomes harder for them to pass on their bigotry to their children when society no longer accepts that bigotry. They won't say that outright but they have made it abundantly clear that, that is what they are truly afraid of.

And unfortunately it's not just the religious fanatics too. That might be enough to ban gay marriage in the deep south but not in California. There are enough secular people that are uncomfortable with the idea of their children living in a world where homosexuality is accepted as natural that Prop 8 passed in one of the most progressive states in the country.

Harvey Milk was right that people would always be against homosexuality but the problem is that the mutual respect thing can't work. People won't respect what they fear and they will fear what they don't understand. The key is making people understand that acceptance of homosexuality is not something that they should fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I agree with many of your points, but still think the mutual respect angle would be good
Part of getting rid of the "fear" is to say that people being gay will exist no matter how hard those that try to "stop" it will try. It finally gets down to respecting others... fear is almost impossible to get rid of due to how one generation passes their hate on to their spawn like cookie recipes.

Part of gaining mutual respect is to show that fearing something like being gay is pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC