George W. bUsh...STOP THE LYING already!!! Stupid MFer!

[LynnTheDem]

Gibson: "If the intelligence had been right , would there have been an Iraq War?"

Bush: "Yes, because Saddam Hussein was unwilling to let the inspectors go in to determine whether or not the U.N. resolutions were being upheld."
http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=6356046

That is BULLSHIT and YOU KNOW IT, bUSH.

The entire world knows it, bUsh. For fuck's sake, even the MFingly stupid freepers know this!

FACT: The UN inspectors were IN IRAQ until the bUsh government abruptly advised U.N. weapons inspectors to immediately pull out of Baghdad.

FACT.

[librechik]

1. I know. What a spectacle

ow I have to wonder if he was ever told the truth about that, becasue he seems to believe so fervently in the false narrative the neocons spun out.


Nah. He's just a bold, craven liar.

[Botany]

2. bingo

Update: In letters, several readers note an additional falsehood in Bush's interview: His claim that we "had to" invade Iraq because Saddam wouldn't let weapons inspectors in. Of course, Hans Blix and his team had gone into Iraq in late 2002 for the first time since 1998, and found no evidence of WMDs. In March, 2003, Bush demanded they leave before they completed their work so he could commence the invasion. Robert Parry recounts the sequence of events here. "Had we had a few months more , we would have been able to tell both the CIA and others that there were no weapons of mass destruction all the sites that they had given to us," Blix told the Associated Press in 2004.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/iraq_war/2008/12/03/bush_exit_interview/print.html

[Diamonique]

4. That's why Bush was in such a hurry.

He had to pull the inspectors out of Iraq before they could report that there were no WMDs.

I wish some news person with balls would dig up a video of Bush telling the inspectors to get out of Iraq before we start bombing.

[lame54]

3. Gibson doesn't seem to know it

[Ganja Ninja]

5. Actually his first response to the question gave him away.

Gibson asks: "If the intelligence had been right, would there have been an Iraq War?"

And Bush responds with: "You mean if they had had WMD's?"

Can he really be that stupid to have misunderstood the question? Unfortunately Yes he is that stupid.

[AndyA]

6. And shame on Charlie Gibson for not calling Bush on it!

Gibson knows this as well, yet he furthered the lie and clouded the truth...again.

Gibson should be fired for not being a journalist, but a Republican tool. That's why I never watch ABC.

[tridim]

7. At least the history books will get it right.

Right?

I'd really like to know why this fucktard thinks he can get away with altering 8 years of history in his last 50 days. Sounds like someone might be giving him bad advice.

[peace frog]

8. How can you tell when Bush43 is lying?

When his lips are moving. Lies are all he has.

[snake in the grass]

9. I despise Bush...

...but I can't really get angry at him for this blatant lie. Let's face it, Bush is a hebephrenic, psychopathic hominid and it is in his nature to lie. However, Gibson knows better but continues to slurp down the demon seed as quickly as Bush can ejaculate it. For this willful failure to do his job I find Gibson and others like him (I can't call them journalists) are a danger to our republic and should literally be tarred and feathered before being run out of town in a shower of rotten tomatoes.

[Jennicut]

10. Idiot. He wanted to invade Iraq all along, it was a plan before he even got elected

[Z_I_Peevey]

11. At this point, he couldn't stop lying if he wanted to.

Too ingrained in his character. He's too crazy, riddled with so many deceptions he can't think his way out of a paper bag.

Plus, the little bit of his pickled brain still in touch with reality must continue to lie to protect the George W. Bush host mechanism from war crimes trials.

[WinkyDink]

12. Hans Blix would beg to differ.